Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 4:34 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 2:39 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04772066
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2021-03-08
First Post:
2021-02-23
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Tools to Assess Medication Adherence
Sponsor:
University Hospital, Montpellier
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Evaluation of Tools to Assess Medication Adherence
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2021-02
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The issue of medication adherence (MA) has long been undestimated but is now growing interest due to both the increase of patients with chronic diseases and the aging of the population. According to the World Health Organization, only 50% of patients with chronic illnesses correctly follow physician's prescriptions in developed countries. Beyond the individual consequences that failure to adherence can engender (increased morbidity, mortality and hospitalizations), this concept also encompasses a collective dimension (risk of transmission of infectious diseases and increased health care costs). Today, improving MA would have more impact on human health than developping new medical therapies. That's why detecting non-adherence constitutes a major public health issue in which pharmacists play a significant role through medication reconciliation and patients' education.
The methods wildly used are based on indirect measurement: questionnaires completed by the patient himself or the Medication Possession Ratio (MPR). Each method has its own advantages and disadvantages, but none is considered as the gold standard. The Montpellier University Hospital set up a MA self-report scale ranging from 0 (low) to 10 (high adherence) in the various care units where the clinical pharmacy activity is deployed.
The purpose of this study was to assess the MA according to this numerical scale and the MPR calculation, and evaluate the correlation between these two methods.
The methods wildly used are based on indirect measurement: questionnaires completed by the patient himself or the Medication Possession Ratio (MPR). Each method has its own advantages and disadvantages, but none is considered as the gold standard. The Montpellier University Hospital set up a MA self-report scale ranging from 0 (low) to 10 (high adherence) in the various care units where the clinical pharmacy activity is deployed.
The purpose of this study was to assess the MA according to this numerical scale and the MPR calculation, and evaluate the correlation between these two methods.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: