Viewing Study NCT03394079



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-06 @ 10:58 AM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 12:38 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT03394079
Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2023-12-20
First Post: 2017-12-25

Brief Title: Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Sponsor: Seung-Jung Park
Organization: Asan Medical Center

Study Overview

Official Title: A Prospective Open Label Multi-center Dual Arm Randomized Pragmatic Trial Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2023-12
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: OCTIVUS
Brief Summary: The primary aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of OCT-guidedoptical coherence tomography OCT-guided and IVUS-guidedIntravascular ultrasound IVUS-guided strategies in patients undergoing Percutaneous coronary intervention PCI with contemporary drug-eluting stents DES or drug-coated balloons only for in-stent restenosis for significant obstructive Coronary artery disease CAD

The investigators hypothesize that OCT-guided PCI is non-inferior to IVUS-guided PCI with respect to primary end point of target-vessel failure cardiac death target-vessel myocardial infarction MI or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization TVR at 1 year after randomization
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None