Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 10:44 AM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 12:34 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03333889
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2017-11-07
First Post:
2017-11-02
Brief Title:
Patient Satisfaction and Crestal Bone Loss of Polymer Infiltrated Ceramic Network Versus Lithium Disilicate Implant Hybrid Abutment Crowns in Esthetic Zone
Sponsor:
Cairo University
Organization:
Cairo University
Study Overview
Official Title:
Patient Satisfaction and Crestal Bone Loss of Polymer Infiltrated Ceramic Network Versus Lithium Disilicate Implant Hybrid Abutment Crowns in Esthetic Zone
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2017-11
Last Known Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
P Population Patients requiring single unit implant restoration in esthetic zone I Intervention Polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network abutment crown VITA Enamic-VITA Zahnfabrik C Comparison Lithium disilicate ceramic abutment crown IPS e max-Ivoclar Vivadent O Outcome patient satisfaction crestal bone loss and periodontal parameters T Time 12 months S Randomized controlled trial research questionFor patients receiving implants in esthetic zone Does the use of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network hybrid abutment crown offer better patient satisfaction less bone loss and better peri-implant clinical parameters when compared to lithium disilicate hybrid abutment crowns
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None