Viewing Study NCT06511661


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 12:20 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-27 @ 9:53 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06511661
Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2024-07-25
First Post: 2024-07-15
Is Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Prognostic Significance of the Uncertain Resection in NSCLC
Sponsor: Sun Yat-sen University
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Prognostic Significance of the Uncertain Resection Based on the Extent of Nodal Dissection for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Retrospective Study
Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2024-07
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The concept of residual tumor classification proposed by the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) was used to assess the completeness of surgical resection, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with incomplete resection were more likely to occur recurrence, leading to significantly poor survival. But this R classification only refers to the surgical margin and neglects other factors associated with surgical quality, such as the extent of lymph node dissection (LND). Therefore, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) proposed the definition of uncertain resection \[R(un)\], which includes the suboptimal extent of LND. However, the clinical significance of R(un) is still controversial. On the one hand, some researches demonstrated that R(un) had definite prognostic significance, with R(un) survival stratifying between R0 and R1. On the other hand, some studies indicated that in early-stage NSCLC, the suboptimal extent of LND had no impact on survival, and the concept of R(un) might be insignificant in these patients. Even in those studies supporting the prognostic significance of R(un), which kind of patients is suitable for R(un) was still unclear. Thus, the investigators explore the impact of the R(un) on the long-term survival of patients with NSCLC using a large cohort in China, to identify those patients who could really benefit from the LND required by the R0 classification proposed by IASLC.
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: