Viewing Study NCT01639066


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 4:18 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-28 @ 7:12 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT01639066
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2018-02-20
First Post: 2012-07-10
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Tenofovir Plus Entecavir vs. Tenofovir in Adefovir-Resistant Chronic Hepatitis B
Sponsor: Asan Medical Center
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Open-label Trial of Tenofovir Plus Entecavir Combination vs. Tenofovir Monotherapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients With Genotypic Resistance to Adefovir and Partial Virologic Response to Ongoing Treatment
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2018-02
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: IN-US-0205
Brief Summary: With the availability of potent nucloes(t)ide analogues (NA), such as tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir (ETV), suppression of serum HBV DNA to undetectable levels by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays became achievable in most NA treatment-naïve patients. Until recently, however, many patients commenced antiviral treatment with inferior NAs prior to the availability of TDF or ETV, such as lamivudine (LAM) or adefovir (ADV) which has a low genetic barrier to resistance.

For patients who developed genotypic resistance against ADV, the efficacy of TDF monotherapy is controversial. In recent studies, TDF monotherapy produced significant suppression of HBV replication. However, only half of patients with initial ADV resistance achieved an undetectable viral load (\<15 IU/ml) with 48 weeks of therapy.

On the other hand, there was a retrospective cohort study reporting that, with the combination of TDF and ETV, most of patients became HBV DNA undetectable after median 6 months of treatment. Probability of reaching complete HBV DNA suppression was not decreased in patients with ADV or ETV resistance.

Together, these observations indicate that there is a controversy about the efficacy of TDF monotherapy in patients with genotypic resistance to ADV.

Thus, in this clinical trial, the investigators will clarify whether tenofovir monotherapy is effective in inducing complete virologic response compared with tenofovir plus entecavir in CHB patients with genotypic resistance to ADV and partial virologic response to ongoing treatment.
Detailed Description: A multi-center randomized active-controlled open-label trial

* Patients will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive tenofovir (300 mg/day) or tenofovir (300 mg/day) plus entecavir (1 mg/day) for 48 weeks.
* Because over 98% of Korean patients with CHB have HBV genotype C, HBV genotype will not be determined or be regarded as a stratification factor.
* Patients' treatment information before randomization will be retrospectively collected.(DNA change, HBeAg status, HBsAg titre, ALT, and treatment duration. etc)
* Patients will be screened within 4 weeks before randomization to determine study eligibility.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: