Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 4:16 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-27 @ 7:50 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01684566
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2016-03-14
First Post:
2012-09-11
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
True
Brief Title:
A Comparative Investigation of Standard Of Care (SOC) and Episil® in Combination Versus SOC Alone on Oral Mucositis
Sponsor:
Camurus AB
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Multicenter, Open-label, Parallel Group Investigation to Compare the Performance of Standard Of Care (SOC) and Episil® in Combination Versus SOC Alone on Oral Mucositis in Patients Receiving Conditioning Treatment for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2015-11
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
episil(R)
Brief Summary:
To compare the performance of standard of care (SOC) + episil® versus SOC alone on oral mucositis in patients receiving conditioning treatment for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The primary variable will be the area under the curve (AUC) of oral mucositis scores defined by the World Health Organisation (WHO) oral toxicity scale assessed daily by the investigator over the 28-day study period.
Detailed Description:
This was multicentre, open-label, randomised parallel-group study. Patients were randomised to one of two parallel treatment groups: episil® in combination with SOC or SOC alone.
The study was originally planned to be conducted in several sites in the following countries: Denmark, Israel, Poland, and Sweden. Following a country-specific Amendment on 20-Feb-2013 and a German Ethical Committee (EC) approval in 07-May-2013, Germany was added to the list of countries where the study would be conducted. No study sites were initiated in Denmark.
The study design was aimed to facilitate direct comparison of the performance of SOC + episil® versus SOC alone. The study was conducted in an open-label manner that is common in trials involving cancer patients, as this takes into the account the ethical issues involved in this indication and patient population. To reduce the likelihood of bias, assignment to study treatment was randomised.
SOC as control group is appropriate and widely used, especially in trials involving cancer patients. In this particular study, basic oral hygiene consisting of brushing, flossing, rinsing and moisturising was taken as the SOC used as control group.
.
The study was originally planned to be conducted in several sites in the following countries: Denmark, Israel, Poland, and Sweden. Following a country-specific Amendment on 20-Feb-2013 and a German Ethical Committee (EC) approval in 07-May-2013, Germany was added to the list of countries where the study would be conducted. No study sites were initiated in Denmark.
The study design was aimed to facilitate direct comparison of the performance of SOC + episil® versus SOC alone. The study was conducted in an open-label manner that is common in trials involving cancer patients, as this takes into the account the ethical issues involved in this indication and patient population. To reduce the likelihood of bias, assignment to study treatment was randomised.
SOC as control group is appropriate and widely used, especially in trials involving cancer patients. In this particular study, basic oral hygiene consisting of brushing, flossing, rinsing and moisturising was taken as the SOC used as control group.
.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: