Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 9:50 AM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 12:20 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03086928
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2017-03-22
First Post:
2017-03-09
Brief Title:
One Year Clinical Evaluation of E-max CAD and Lava Ultimate Laminate Veneers
Sponsor:
Cairo University
Organization:
Cairo University
Study Overview
Official Title:
One Year Clinical Evaluation of E-max CAD and Lava Ultimate Laminate Veneers With Butt Joint Preparation
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2017-03
Last Known Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Restoration of anterior teeth using conservative approach allows clinicians to provide porcelain laminate veneers with excellent esthetics without extensive tooth structure removal laminate veneers need the use of etch-able ceramics like glass ceramics Emax and hybrid ceramics Lava Ultimate The aim of this study is to compare both emax and lava ultimate veneers clinically
Detailed Description:
The use of E-max CAD well documented in the literatures as successful restoration modality which has superior optical and mechanical properties The introduction of hybrid ceramic materials combined the advantages of both glass ceramics and composite resin Resin nano-ceramic is a mixture of a resin composite matrix and nano-ceramic fillers of approximately 80 by weight The main advantages of this material over the glass ceramics are the stress absorbing action or stress distribution by having modulus of elasticity near to the tooth dentin and can be individualized intra-orally or extra-orally either before or after definitive cementation
Yet there are no studies for clinical evaluation of both mentioned laminate veneers restorations This study is conducted to compare between both materials clinically according to modified USPHS criteria in terms of marginal adaptation fracture debonding marginal discoloration and patient satisfaction
Yet there are no studies for clinical evaluation of both mentioned laminate veneers restorations This study is conducted to compare between both materials clinically according to modified USPHS criteria in terms of marginal adaptation fracture debonding marginal discoloration and patient satisfaction
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None