Viewing Study NCT00259350



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-05 @ 12:09 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 9:21 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT00259350
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2009-01-27
First Post: 2005-11-27

Brief Title: Chlorhexidine vs Povidone Iodine in Alcoholic Solutions for Prevention of Central Venous Catheter Infection
Sponsor: Poitiers University Hospital
Organization: Poitiers University Hospital

Study Overview

Official Title: Prevention of Central Venous Catheter Infections Comparison of the Efficacy of Skin Disinfection With 5 Povidone Iodine in Alcoholic Solution Versus 025 Chlorhexidine 0025 Benzalkonium and 4 Benzylic Alcohol
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2009-01
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The best antiseptic solution for cateheter care remains unknownHigh concentration in aquous solution or low concentration in alcoholic solution of chlorhexidine actbetter than povidone iodine in aquous solutions No study has compare alcoholic formulations of low concentration of chlorhexidine and povidone iodine for skin disinfection prior to insertion of central venous catheters

To compare the incidence of central venous catheter colonization after skin disinfection with either an alcoholic solution of povidone iodine or a combination of 05 chlorhexidine 0025 Benzalkonium and 4 benzylic alcohol

To compare the incidence of catheter related bacteremia in the to study groups To compare the local and general tolerance of the two antiseptic formulations
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None