Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 9:34 AM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 12:16 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03012503
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2017-01-06
First Post:
2017-01-03
Brief Title:
The Effect of Biofreeze on Post Manipulation Soreness in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain
Sponsor:
Marquette University
Organization:
Marquette University
Study Overview
Official Title:
The Effect of Biofreeze on Post Manipulation Soreness in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2017-01
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Background Neck pain effects a significant number of individuals and is commonly treated with chiropractic cervical manipulation The temporary increases in neck pain following cervical manipulation may contribute to a lack of compliance with prescribed therapy that following this therapy which in turn commonly contributes to protracted symptoms Topical menthol has previously been shown to decrease pain shortly following application The purpose of this study was to determine if patients with mechanical neck pain who received topical menthol gel applied to their neck prior to cervical manipulation would have less pain and increased neck range of motion following cervical manipulation than patients who did not receive menthol
Methods Patients mean ages 35 years old with non-radicular mechanical neck pain were randomly assigned to a control n31 or a treatment n29 group Five minutes before cervical manipulation controls received a placebo gel applied to their neck while the treatment group received a menthol containing gel Biofreeze applied to their neck Participants rated their neck pain on a 10-point scale prior to gel application Pre and at one minute T1 10 minutes T2 20 minutes T3 and 30 minutes T4 post cervical manipulation Six measures of neck range of motion were assessed prior to topical applications of gel and at T1 and T4 ANCOVA repeated measures were performed to compare pain ratings and neck range of motion following manipulation while controlling for Pre measures
Methods Patients mean ages 35 years old with non-radicular mechanical neck pain were randomly assigned to a control n31 or a treatment n29 group Five minutes before cervical manipulation controls received a placebo gel applied to their neck while the treatment group received a menthol containing gel Biofreeze applied to their neck Participants rated their neck pain on a 10-point scale prior to gel application Pre and at one minute T1 10 minutes T2 20 minutes T3 and 30 minutes T4 post cervical manipulation Six measures of neck range of motion were assessed prior to topical applications of gel and at T1 and T4 ANCOVA repeated measures were performed to compare pain ratings and neck range of motion following manipulation while controlling for Pre measures
Detailed Description:
Background Neck pain effects a significant number of individuals and is commonly treated with chiropractic cervical manipulation The temporary increases in neck pain following cervical manipulation may contribute to a lack of compliance with prescribed therapy that following this therapy which in turn commonly contributes to protracted symptoms Topical menthol has previously been shown to decrease pain shortly following application The purpose of this study was to determine if patients with mechanical neck pain who received topical menthol gel applied to their neck prior to cervical manipulation would have less pain and increased neck range of motion following cervical manipulation than patients who did not receive menthol
Methods Patients mean ages 35 years old with non-radicular mechanical neck pain were randomly assigned to a control n31 or a treatment n29 group Five minutes before cervical manipulation controls received a placebo gel applied to their neck while the treatment group received a menthol containing gel Biofreeze applied to their neck Participants rated their neck pain on a 10-point scale prior to gel application Pre and at one minute T1 10 minutes T2 20 minutes T3 and 30 minutes T4 post cervical manipulation Six measures of neck range of motion were assessed prior to topical applications of gel and at T1 and T4 ANCOVA repeated measures were performed to compare pain ratings and neck range of motion following manipulation while controlling for Pre measures
Methods Patients mean ages 35 years old with non-radicular mechanical neck pain were randomly assigned to a control n31 or a treatment n29 group Five minutes before cervical manipulation controls received a placebo gel applied to their neck while the treatment group received a menthol containing gel Biofreeze applied to their neck Participants rated their neck pain on a 10-point scale prior to gel application Pre and at one minute T1 10 minutes T2 20 minutes T3 and 30 minutes T4 post cervical manipulation Six measures of neck range of motion were assessed prior to topical applications of gel and at T1 and T4 ANCOVA repeated measures were performed to compare pain ratings and neck range of motion following manipulation while controlling for Pre measures
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None