Viewing Study NCT06984666


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 4:02 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-26 @ 7:14 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06984666
Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Last Update Posted: 2025-05-22
First Post: 2025-05-14
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Facial Aesthetic Analysis Model Based on Clinical Cohort Phenotype to Explore 45° Facial Profile.
Sponsor: Linyu Xu
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: The Perception of Lower Third of the Face Combined With Digital Virtual Models and the Clinical Phenotype at 45° Viewing Angle : a Clinical Study
Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Status Verified Date: 2024-09
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Facial aesthetics has always been a complex and subjective concept. The overall facial harmony, along with lip protrusion, which is often a focus for orthodontists, requires evaluation from multiple perspectives. The viewing angle also influences the assessment of facial aesthetics, particularly the judgment of lip protrusion. This study aims to explore the differences in facial fixation patterns and aesthetic evaluations among different populations at specific viewing angles by using digital models to simulate various perspectives.
Detailed Description: In the analysis of facial aesthetics, the 45° profile has a unique advantage in evaluating lip protrusion, zygomatic fullness, and contour curve. Compared to the frontal view, this angle provides a more three-dimensional and deeper perspective. In a previous study, the research group found that the shape of the midface area at 45° influences the evaluation of lip protrusion. In this study, a digital model was used to simulate the protrusion of different midface areas in order to explore the differences in facial fixation patterns and aesthetic evaluations among various individuals at 45°. Based on data from individuals who showed significant improvement in frontal and profile beauty before and after clinical treatment, the study added an evaluation of beauty and lip position from the 45° profile. This aims to provide a reference for the subsequent establishment of a 45° profile analysis.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: