Viewing Study NCT00247741



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-05 @ 12:06 PM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 9:20 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT00247741
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2013-12-19
First Post: 2005-11-01

Brief Title: Spinal Anesthesia With Articaine and Lidocaine for Outpatient Surgery
Sponsor: St Antonius Hospital
Organization: St Antonius Hospital

Study Overview

Official Title: Spinal Anesthesia With Articaine and Lidocaine for Outpatient Surgery A Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2005-10
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to compare two short-acting local anesthetics articaine and lidocaine for spinal anesthesia in day-case surgery The onset time of the sensory- and motor block recovery time until discharge and complications will be studied
Detailed Description: The ideal spinal anesthesia in day-case surgery is characterized by a short onset of sensory and motor blockade and a rapid recovery after the operation Short-acting local-anesthetics are used frequently in this setting

Lidocaine is one of the agents that is used most frequently It has been associated with an increased incidence of Transient Neurological Symptoms TNS Articaine is another agent that is being used more often and is said to act faster and shorter than lidocaine

We will compare spinal anesthesia with lidocaine and articaine in a randomized double-blind clinical trial Endpoint are

onset of sensory and motor block
recovery from sensory and motor block
time to micturition
patient satisfaction
complications

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None