Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 3:58 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-27 @ 5:58 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00522392
Status:
TERMINATED
Last Update Posted:
2015-06-26
First Post:
2007-08-28
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
True
Brief Title:
Bortezomib and Dexamethasone With or Without Lenalidomide in Treating Patients With Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated With Dexamethasone
Sponsor:
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Randomized Phase III Trial of Consolidation Therapy With Bortezomib (Velcade®)-Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) -Dexamethasone (VRD) Versus Bortezomib (Velcade®)-Dexamethasone (VD) for Patients With Multiple Myeloma Who Have Completed a Dexamethasone Based Induction Regimen
Status:
TERMINATED
Status Verified Date:
2015-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Slow accrual
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This randomized phase III trial compares bortezomib, dexamethasone, and lenalidomide with bortezomib and dexamethasone to see how well they work in treating patients with multiple myeloma previously treated with dexamethasone. Bortezomib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as dexamethasone, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Lenalidomide may stimulate the immune system in different ways and stop cancer cells from growing. It is not yet known whether giving bortezomib and dexamethasone is more effective with or without lenalidomide in treating multiple myeloma.
Detailed Description:
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare the progression-free survival (PFS) for two consolidation regimens: bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD) versus bortezomib and dexamethasone (VD) only.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine the incremental ability of VRD versus VD in attaining a complete response or a very good partial response (VGPR) in patients receiving induction therapy with a dexamethasone based induction regimen.
II. To compare the overall survival, measured from the time of study entry.
III. Evaluate response rate and PFS according to cytogenetic category (by gene expression and fluorescence in situ hybridization \[FISH\]).
IV. To evaluate the toxicity of the two regimens.
V. To compare quality of life (QOL) based on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-Neurotoxicity (Ntx) Trial Outcome Index (TOI) of patients receiving VD to those receiving VRD from registration to 6 months post consolidation treatment.
VI. To examine the impact of differential treatment response (PFS), if observed, on QOL based on the FACT-Ntx TOI up to 12 months post consolidation treatment.
VII. To obtain prospective data on multiple myeloma specific QOL attributes.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
ARM A: Patients receive bortezomib at 1.3 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11, lenalidomide orally (PO) once daily (QD) at 15 mg on days 1-14, and dexamethasone at 40 mg total dose per day PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM B: Patients receive bortezomib at 1.3 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 and dexamethasone at 40 mg total dose per day PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then every 12 months for 5 years.
I. To compare the progression-free survival (PFS) for two consolidation regimens: bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD) versus bortezomib and dexamethasone (VD) only.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine the incremental ability of VRD versus VD in attaining a complete response or a very good partial response (VGPR) in patients receiving induction therapy with a dexamethasone based induction regimen.
II. To compare the overall survival, measured from the time of study entry.
III. Evaluate response rate and PFS according to cytogenetic category (by gene expression and fluorescence in situ hybridization \[FISH\]).
IV. To evaluate the toxicity of the two regimens.
V. To compare quality of life (QOL) based on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-Neurotoxicity (Ntx) Trial Outcome Index (TOI) of patients receiving VD to those receiving VRD from registration to 6 months post consolidation treatment.
VI. To examine the impact of differential treatment response (PFS), if observed, on QOL based on the FACT-Ntx TOI up to 12 months post consolidation treatment.
VII. To obtain prospective data on multiple myeloma specific QOL attributes.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
ARM A: Patients receive bortezomib at 1.3 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11, lenalidomide orally (PO) once daily (QD) at 15 mg on days 1-14, and dexamethasone at 40 mg total dose per day PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM B: Patients receive bortezomib at 1.3 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 and dexamethasone at 40 mg total dose per day PO QD on days 1, 8, and 15. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then every 12 months for 5 years.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
Secondary ID Infos
| Secondary ID | Type | Domain | Link | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCI-2009-00521 | REGISTRY | CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program) | View | |
| E1A05 | OTHER | Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) | View | |
| U10CA021115 | NIH | None | https://reporter.nih.gov/quic… | View |
| U10CA180820 | NIH | None | https://reporter.nih.gov/quic… | View |