Viewing Study NCT06803992


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 3:56 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-29 @ 12:53 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT06803992
Status: RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2025-12-01
First Post: 2025-01-19
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Induction of Labor - Comparison Propess With Prostaglandin E2 Vaginal Gel and Balloon Catheter
Sponsor: HaEmek Medical Center, Israel
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Induction of Labor in Women With Unfavorable Cervix at Term - Comparison of Propess Versus Prostaglandin E2 Vaginal Gel and Extra-amniotic Balloon Catheter
Status: RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2025-01
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: One of every four births in the Western world is induced, usually due to the risk of maternal and fetal morbidity. There are several methods of labor induction, pharmacological and mechanical. In cases of unfavorable cervix (Bishop score is below 5), cervical ripening can be induced by either prostaglandins E2 (slow release 10 mg dinoprostone insert (propess) or vaginal gel 1-2 mg) or mechanically by Foley catheter balloon (FCB).

The efficacy of labor induction of propess versus vaginal gel combined with FCB was not studied previously.

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the efficacy of propess versus PGE2 vaginal gel combined with FCB in women with singletons undergoing labor induction at term. The main question it aims to answer is to compare the time from the beginning of labor induction until delivery.
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: True
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: