Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 3:54 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-31 @ 4:16 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01986192
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2014-11-19
First Post:
2013-11-11
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Prevention of Recurrence After Thrombolysis in Acute Iliofemoral Venous Thrombosis (PRAIS) Study
Sponsor:
Seoul National University Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
An Efficacy and Safety Study of Ribaroxaban for the Prevention of Deep Vein Thrombosis Recurrence in Patients With Acute Iliofemoral Venous Thrombosis Initially Treated With Thrombolysis
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2014-11
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
PRAIS
Brief Summary:
The EINSTEIN program showed that oral rivaroxaban is effective and safe treatment for prevention of recurrent venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in deep vein thrombosis patients and FDA approved the rivaroxaban for prevention and treatment of deep vein thrombosis (Nov 2 2012).
Recently, catheter-directed thrombolysis can significantly reduce post-thrombotic syndrome, and more and more centers introduce catheter-directed thrombolysis to treat proximal (i.e, iliofemoral) DVT. However, the EINSTEIN program excluded patients with deep vein thrombosis if they had been treated with a vena cava filter or a fibrinolytic agent for the current episode of thrombosis.
Although catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) or pharmacomechanical thrombolysis has now been accepted as a treatment of choice in iliofemoral DVT, thrombolysis has an inherent risk of bleeding. Therefore, patients who have completed CDT and have been stabilized at least 24 hours after thrombolysis will be included in this study.
Also, the investigators want to explore the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with iliofemoral DVT after catheter-directed thrombolysis and/or a vena cava filter insertion and/or venous stent insertion and compare these outcomes with warfarin treatment alone.
This study will be a pilot study to establish the safety and efficacy parameters for further studies.
Recently, catheter-directed thrombolysis can significantly reduce post-thrombotic syndrome, and more and more centers introduce catheter-directed thrombolysis to treat proximal (i.e, iliofemoral) DVT. However, the EINSTEIN program excluded patients with deep vein thrombosis if they had been treated with a vena cava filter or a fibrinolytic agent for the current episode of thrombosis.
Although catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) or pharmacomechanical thrombolysis has now been accepted as a treatment of choice in iliofemoral DVT, thrombolysis has an inherent risk of bleeding. Therefore, patients who have completed CDT and have been stabilized at least 24 hours after thrombolysis will be included in this study.
Also, the investigators want to explore the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with iliofemoral DVT after catheter-directed thrombolysis and/or a vena cava filter insertion and/or venous stent insertion and compare these outcomes with warfarin treatment alone.
This study will be a pilot study to establish the safety and efficacy parameters for further studies.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: