Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 8:29 AM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 12:00 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02748759
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2016-04-22
First Post:
2016-04-15
Brief Title:
Early Mobilization of Knee Joint After ACL Surgery Continuous Passive Motion Versus Manual Passive Mobilization
Sponsor:
Jesús Montesinos Muñoz
Organization:
Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa
Study Overview
Official Title:
Early Mobilization of Knee Joint After ACL Reconstructive Surgery Comparing Continuous Passive Motion Versus Manual Passive Mobilization
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2016-04
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ACL injuries by trauma are a prevalent pathology In the USA about 200000 injuries are estimated per year half of which implicate a total rupture of the ligament Data indicates that the number of ACL injuries is increasing in young athletes and presents a common problem especially people playing agility sports
One of the most widely used methods for the post-surgical mobilization after ACL is the use of Continuous Passive Motion CPM devices These machines are meant to drain residual fluid from the articulation and maintain the mobility of the joint and muscles in the knee Even though studies show that an early mobilization after surgery is beneficial to the rehabilitation of the knee joint recent studies are questioning the efficiency of the CPM when compared with the goal of application While literature suggests that efficacy of CPM are related with the magnitude of knee flexion and the Range of Motion ROM achieved some studies show that the range of motion measured by the CPM is considerably less than the actual ROM
As other therapy that provides an effective mobilization of the knee joint the Specific Manual Physical Therapy method Kaltenborn method takes in account the physiological combination of rotation and gliding of the two joint surfaces This technique mobilizes the femorotibial joint by controlling the tibial plateau anteroposterior during flexion and posteroanterior during extension of the knee Therefore in the past 30 years there are not studies comparing ROM measurements obtained with CPM and manual physical therapy methods
It is hypothesized that the benefits of the early passive mobilization after ACL reconstructive surgery are diminished by the limited efficacy of currently used CPM devices The aim of our study was to determine the range of motion achieved with the passive mobilization using a CPM device compared with a manual method Kaltenborn method and to assess that ROM measurements provided by the CPM correlates the real ROM
One of the most widely used methods for the post-surgical mobilization after ACL is the use of Continuous Passive Motion CPM devices These machines are meant to drain residual fluid from the articulation and maintain the mobility of the joint and muscles in the knee Even though studies show that an early mobilization after surgery is beneficial to the rehabilitation of the knee joint recent studies are questioning the efficiency of the CPM when compared with the goal of application While literature suggests that efficacy of CPM are related with the magnitude of knee flexion and the Range of Motion ROM achieved some studies show that the range of motion measured by the CPM is considerably less than the actual ROM
As other therapy that provides an effective mobilization of the knee joint the Specific Manual Physical Therapy method Kaltenborn method takes in account the physiological combination of rotation and gliding of the two joint surfaces This technique mobilizes the femorotibial joint by controlling the tibial plateau anteroposterior during flexion and posteroanterior during extension of the knee Therefore in the past 30 years there are not studies comparing ROM measurements obtained with CPM and manual physical therapy methods
It is hypothesized that the benefits of the early passive mobilization after ACL reconstructive surgery are diminished by the limited efficacy of currently used CPM devices The aim of our study was to determine the range of motion achieved with the passive mobilization using a CPM device compared with a manual method Kaltenborn method and to assess that ROM measurements provided by the CPM correlates the real ROM
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None