Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 3:49 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 6:36 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03208192
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2020-09-24
First Post:
2017-06-26
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
True
Brief Title:
Comparison of Hydro-dissection Versus Ultrasonic Aspirator in Division of Liver Parenchyma in Laparoscopic Resection
Sponsor:
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of Hydro-dissection Versus Ultrasonic Aspirator in Division of Liver Parenchyma in Laparoscopic Resection
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2020-09
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
LLS
Brief Summary:
Background: until now, there is no agreement about the safest and feasible method for liver parenchyma transection during laparoscopic liver resection.
Study design: prospective, randomized, single-center The purpose of the study: comparison of short-term results of two methods of parenchyma liver transection during laparoscopic liver resection
Study design: prospective, randomized, single-center The purpose of the study: comparison of short-term results of two methods of parenchyma liver transection during laparoscopic liver resection
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: