Viewing Study NCT05960292


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 3:48 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-01-05 @ 1:05 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT05960292
Status: UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted: 2023-09-07
First Post: 2023-07-12
Is Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Approach Closure Complications
Sponsor: Egymedicalpedia
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Approach Closure Complications of Vaginal Vault in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Status: UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date: 2023-09
Last Known Status: RECRUITING
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Hysterectomy is considered as a common operation in Gynecology. Hysterectomy could be made by vaginally, laparoscopically or abdominally. The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologist advises the use of a minimally invasive technique for the sake of women and to decrease hospital stay and costs.
Detailed Description: Laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) is a minimally invasive operation that could be made when vaginal hysterectomy is not accessible due to anatomical problems.

Vaginal cuff dehiscence (VCD) is a severe adverse event and occurs more frequently after total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) compared with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy.

The study shows effects of the laparoscopic approach versus the vaginal route for the management of vaginal cuff closure during total laparoscopic hysterectomy on female sexual function.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: