Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 3:37 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-28 @ 8:58 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06653192
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-07-29
First Post:
2024-10-19
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
EUS-guided Choledochoduodenostomy vs ERCP as First Line in Malignant Distal Obstruction (CARPEDIEM Trial)
Sponsor:
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage With Lumen-Apposing Stent vs Classical ERCP for First-line Therapy of Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: An Open-label, Multicenter Randomized Trial (CARPEDIEM Trial)
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate the biliary drainage technical failure rate and/or the postprocedure acute pancreatitis rate between EUS-CDS vs ERCP procedures in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction.
Detailed Description:
Ecoendoscopy-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) has been extended as a second line treatment in cases of ERCP failure in malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO). However, there are clinical trials which have compared it with ERCP as a first line treatment for MDBO in palliative patients, showing similar clinical and technical success and adverse events (AEs) rate between both techniques. Data about the benefit of this techique in potentially surgical patients is still limited.
Recent retrospective study (Janet J et al, Ann Surg Oncol 2023) and two recent meta-analysis (Barbosa E et al, GIE 2024; Gopakumar H et al, AM J Gastr 2024; both with \> 500 cases) found that EUS-CDS group had significantly less technical failure rate and less postprocedure pancreatitis rate.
Thus, our hypothesis is that EUS-CDS has benefits in terms of decreasing those rates (technical failure, postprocedure pancreatitis) when compared to ERCP in MDBO in potentially surgical patients with resectable and borderline disease.
Recent retrospective study (Janet J et al, Ann Surg Oncol 2023) and two recent meta-analysis (Barbosa E et al, GIE 2024; Gopakumar H et al, AM J Gastr 2024; both with \> 500 cases) found that EUS-CDS group had significantly less technical failure rate and less postprocedure pancreatitis rate.
Thus, our hypothesis is that EUS-CDS has benefits in terms of decreasing those rates (technical failure, postprocedure pancreatitis) when compared to ERCP in MDBO in potentially surgical patients with resectable and borderline disease.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
True
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
True
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: