Viewing Study NCT02546466



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-06 @ 7:31 AM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 11:49 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT02546466
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2019-02-28
First Post: 2015-09-08

Brief Title: Effects of Functional Taping on Static Postural Control in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain
Sponsor: University of Sao Paulo
Organization: University of Sao Paulo

Study Overview

Official Title: Effects of Functional Taping Compared to Sham and Minimal Intervention Strategy on Pain Intensity and Static Postural Control in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain a Protocol for a Randomized Sham-controlled Trial
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2019-02
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Background Low back pain is a major public health problem that affects most people at some point in life and results in major psychosocial economic functional and physical consequences that can last for days and months Most cases are undiagnosed and become chronic non-specific low back pain Studies showed that these patients presented changes in postural control yet the information is inconsistent as well as the effects of Functional Taping FT

Objectives The aim of this study will be to investigate the immediate and one-month follow-up effects of the use of Functional Taping to lumbar spine on pain intensity and postural control in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain CLBP

Methods This study will be a sham-controlled and randomized clinical trial Participants One hundred and twenty participants 18 and 50 years both genders Interventions Participants will be randomly allocated to receive three possible interventions Functional Star-shape Taping Sham Functional Taping both interventions during seven days and a Minimal Intervention MI one session Main outcome measures Primary outcomes will be pain intensity and posturography to assess balance parameters Low back pain related disability global perceived effect of treatment and fear avoidance beliefs will be considered as secondary outcomes Four measurements of static posturography will be conducted pre-intervention immediately after application of the tape after seven days post-intervention after removal of the tape and after one month follow-up period Secondary and primary outcomes will be assessed on three occasions pre-intervention seven days post-intervention and after one month follow-up period All statistical analysis will be conducted following the principles of intention to treat and the effects of treatment will be calculated using linear mixed models
Detailed Description: BACKGROUND

Considering that evidence suggests that patients with CLBP have changes in postural control we highlight the importance of conduct studies to identify treatment strategies that can influence postural control like as FT In this way the objective of the present study is to compare the effects of Functional Star-shape Taping FST vs Sham-FT vs MI on pain intensity and postural control primary outcomes in CLBP patients The secondary outcomes will be low back pain related disability global perceived effect of treatment and fear avoidance beliefs

METHODS

Study design

This study will be a sham-controlled randomized three-arm parallel-group clinical Study participants

The sample will be composed of 120 participants both genders with nonspecific CLBP who will be referred to the physiotherapy clinic of the UENP Center for Health Sciences Paraná state Brazil

Allergy test

Firstly an assessor blinded to the treatment allocation collected the baseline data and performed an allergy test on all participants This allergy test consisted of applying a small patch of FT over the skin Participants kept this patch on for 24 hours and will be instructed to remove the patch and call the researchers if any allergic reaction occurred Only patients without allergic reaction to the patch test were then scheduled to undergo randomization

Randomisation and allocation

The proposed study will follow the recommendations described in Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials CONSORT statement Moher et al 2010 Once the patient has accepted an invitation to participate they will give written consent before being assessed for eligibility Firstly one researcher will gather the clinical assessment and allergy test to exclude noneligible participants Only patients without allergic reaction to the patch test will be scheduled to randomisation After this initial assessment participants will be randomly assigned following simple randomisation procedures computerized random numbers to 1 of 3 treatment groups opaque sealed envelopes containing cards will be used 1 Functional Star-shape Taping FST 2 Sham-FT and 3 MI The allocation sequence will be generated by a researcher not involved in the assessment and interventions and one research assistant will assign participants to interventions

Procedures

Following the allocation process a blinded investigator will conduct clinical assessments and collect primary and secondary outcomes and psychosocial variables In the same session another investigator who is a certified Kinesio tape practitioner will proceed with the treatment according to the group assignment and will be therefore responsible for applying the functional tape and MI Patients in the FST and Sham-FT groups will be blinded to interventions sham or not and will be advised to leave the tape in situ for one week The MI group will receive a booklet with biopsychosocial education and orientations

Initial evaluation

The evaluations will be carried out according to the recommendations of the Initiative on Methods Measurement and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials IMMPACT for chronic pain

Primary Outcomes

Pain intensity

Measurement of pain intensity will accomplish using the application of the NPRS which consists of a sequence of numbers from 0 to 10 in which 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst pain imaginable

Postural control on force platform - Static Posturography with and without a secondary task

Static posturography will be evaluated using a force platform 400 Biomec EMG system of Brazil Ltda São José dos Campos Brazil with frequency acquisition of 100 Hz and a second-order 35 Hz low pass Butterworth filter Posturography analysis of the COP will be carried out by four main parameters of balance 1 ellipse 95 of the COP in square centimeters A-COP in cm2 2 Root Mean Square of oscillation of the COP RMS in cm2 3 mean speed MVeloc in cms of the displacement of the COP in anteroposterior AP and medial-lateral ML directions and 4 mean frequency MF in Hz of the displacement of the COP in anteroposterior AP and medial-lateral ML directions

A modified clinical test of sensory interaction for balance CTSIBm will be used by measuring the static balance in four sensory conditions 1 eyes open on stable surface 2 eyes closed on stable surface 3 eyes open on unstable surface 4 eyes closed on unstable surface For each condition the participant will be evaluated three times for 40 seconds with a 30-second interval between assessments

For the assessment of static posturography with a secondary task volunteers will be requested to perform a fast movement of shoulder flexion bilateral Participants will be trained to carry out the tests with maximum arm speed approximately 120ºseg and amplitude at about 60º immediately after the auditory stimulus Participants will perform five movements open and closed eyes with a time interval of 30 seconds between each repetition and an auditory stimulus will precede the trigger by a random period of 05-2 s

Secondary Outcomes

Disability and Participant ratings of global improvement and satisfaction with treatment - Global perceived effect Fear avoidance beliefs questionnaire FABQ

Psychosocial Measures - Baseline measure

Hospital anxiety and depression scale - HADS and Pain catastrophizing scale - PCS and Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale - CPSS

Interventions

Functional Taping Intervention

Participants will be subjected to one of two possible intervention procedures with FT 1 Functional Star-shape Taping FST 2 Sham Functional Taping Sham-FT The participants will be blinded as to whether they received SFT or Sham-FT and the two interventions will be performed in the lumbar region The elastic adhesive bandage used will have 50 cm wide and 05 mm thick Kinesio Tex Gold brand Kinesio Holding Corporation Albuquerque USA and resistant to contact with water All participants will be informed that they would receive one of the two types of FT application During this period of application the participants will be directed to maintain their daily life activities and will be blinded with respect to which intervention procedure they received if sham or not

Minimal Intervention Strategy MI

The MI group will receive an educational and counseling booklet a booklet based on The Back Book

Data analysis

The two primary outcome variables posturography and pain intensity were considered for calculation of sample size For posturography we will consider an improvement of at least 20 mean speed of oscillation of the COP pre- and immediate post-treatment The sample size was 27 participants The following specifications were considered α5 and 95 statistical power and effect size of 076 for F-test For pain intensity an improvement of at least 20 on the NPRS pre-treatment 56 and post-treatment and follow-up 4 SD 18 The sample size obtained was 93 31 participants per group The following specifications were considered α5 and statistical power of 95 and effect size of 041 for F-test Thus to ensure a power suitable and assuming sample losses 120 participants will be considered at least 9 losses per group GPower 3010 University of Kiel Germany

The statistician will be given grouped data but data will be coded so that the statistician will remain blinded to patients group allocation and to protect patient confidentiality The mean effects of the interventions and the group differences for all outcomes primary and secondary will be calculated using linear mixed models that incorporated terms for the treatment groups time post-intervention and follow-up and interaction terms treatment subgroups and time as well as psychosocial variables sex and age as covariates Secondary analysis will be conducted using regression models to determine whether baseline scores of psychosocial variables HADS PCS CPSS will moderate the effect of treatments FT sham FT or MI The analyzes will follow the intention-to-treat principles

Additionally analyzes will be performed on subgroups of patients with worse and better postural control parameters by determining cut-off values for instability based on data previously published in the literature These analyzes will be carried out to identify potential subgroups of better and worse rates of postural control and possible effects of FT The same procedure will be performed to analyze psychosocial subgroups

For all of these analyzes we will use the IBM SPSS software package version 22 IBM Corp Armonk New York

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None