Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 12:13 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-31 @ 8:07 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04260061
Status:
WITHDRAWN
Last Update Posted:
2020-10-26
First Post:
2020-02-05
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Differential Effectiveness of Robotic Assisted Therapy on Upper Extremity Function in Patients With Chronic Stroke
Sponsor:
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Differential Effectiveness of Robotic Assisted Therapy on Upper Extremity Function and Health Related Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Stroke: a Comparison of Exoskeleton vs. End Effector Training Systems
Status:
WITHDRAWN
Status Verified Date:
2020-10
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
These is understaffed to excute study now.
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The objectives of this study are to: determine the effects of exoskeleton vs. end effector training systems on upper extremity motor and physiological function, daily functions, quality of life and self-efficacy in patients with chronic stroke.
Detailed Description:
According to the theory and literature review, there are two hypotheses in this study. One is that exoskeleton training system has better benefits than end-effector training system in motion control techniques, joint mobility and muscle tone control. Second, end-effector training system has better benefits than exoskeleton training system in the functional activity level and daily life participation.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: