Viewing Study NCT04661592


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 3:35 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-01-02 @ 3:24 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT04661592
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2022-03-24
First Post: 2020-11-17
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: NCP 2.0 Repeat Study
Sponsor: NeuroCatch Inc.
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Assessing Repeatability of the NeuroCatch Platform 2.0 Stimulus Sequences
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2022-03
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The NeuroCatch Platformâ„¢ version 2.0 (NCP2.0), an investigational medical device system developed by NeuroCatch Inc., consists of software and hardware that captures brain health information. The platform intends to provide a quick, portable and easy to use solution for the acquisition, display, analysis, storage, reporting and management of electroencephalograph (EEG) and event-related potential (ERP; brain response to a stimulus) information.

The purpose of the study is to understand how reliable and repeatable the ERP metrics elicited by the NCP platform are within participants over multiple sessions.
Detailed Description: A new method for creating stimulus sequences was developed for NeuroCatchâ„¢ Platform 2.0. Rather than using a set of fixed, predetermined sequences to elicit ERPs this new method draws on a database of candidate word stimuli to generate a different, random stimulus sequence each time a scan is carried out. The goal of this is to reduce habituation to the stimulus sequences which is hypothesized to improve the repeatability of the component measurements. Characterizing how individuals respond to the stimulus sequences is an important step in the validation of the generation method itself. Understanding the degree of variability and prototypical values of each ERP component is crucial to the understanding of typical brain functioning. For this type of technology to be clinically viable in quantifying brain health, the investigators must first quantify the degree to which a healthy brain naturally fluctuates in it processing capability. This study is being carried out to assess how repeatable the ERPs elicited by the new method are while also considering the impact of intraindividual variability observed in previous investigations. Thus, by comparing the results of the scans over time, an assessment of the reliability of the new stimulus sequences can be made.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: