Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 3:34 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 3:59 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01601392
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2012-05-18
First Post:
2012-05-11
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Anodal and Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Stroke Recovery
Sponsor:
Dina Hatem Elhammady
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Effect of Anodal Versus Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Stroke Recovery: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2012-05
Last Known Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
tDCS
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study will to compare the long-term effect of anodal versus cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on motor recovery in subacute stroke patients. Forty patients with subacute ischemic stroke will randomly assigned to one of three groups: Anodal, Cathodal and Sham. Each group will receive tDCS at an intensity of 2mA for 25 minutes daily for 6 consecutive days over the affected (Anodal, Sham) or unaffected (Cathodal) motor cortex. Patients will be assessed with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), the Barthel index (BI) and the Medical Research Council (MRC) muscle strength scale at baseline, after end of the 6th tDCS session, and then 1, 2 and 3 months later. Motor cortical excitability will be measured at baseline and after the 6th session in both hemispheres.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
Is an Unapproved Device?:
Is a PPSD?:
Is a US Export?:
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: