Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-05 @ 11:58 AM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 9:17 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00199498
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2016-04-13
First Post:
2005-09-13
Brief Title:
Right Apical Versus Septal Pacing Trial
Sponsor:
Lawson Health Research Institute
Organization:
Lawson Health Research Institute
Study Overview
Official Title:
Right Apical Versus Septal Pacing Trial
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2016-04
Last Known Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
RASP
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to examine whether RV right ventricularseptal pacing has any effect on LV left ventricular function than RV apical pacing in patients who require ventricular pacing
Detailed Description:
The primary objective of this study is to compare the effect of RV pacing site on LV systolic function as measured by LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction
Secondary objectives of this trial include
1 to compare the effect of RVSeptalRVS versus RVApicalRVApacing on other indices of systolic and diastolic LV function
2 to compare the rate of heart failure-related hospitalization between RVS versus RVA pacing
3 to compare new-onset atrial fibrillation and stroke rates between RVS versus RVA pacing
4 to assess the effect of RVA versus RVS pacing on quality of life and functional capacity
5 to compare the rate of successful pacemaker lead implantation complications and chronic electrical performance of RVS versus RVA pacing
Secondary objectives of this trial include
1 to compare the effect of RVSeptalRVS versus RVApicalRVApacing on other indices of systolic and diastolic LV function
2 to compare the rate of heart failure-related hospitalization between RVS versus RVA pacing
3 to compare new-onset atrial fibrillation and stroke rates between RVS versus RVA pacing
4 to assess the effect of RVA versus RVS pacing on quality of life and functional capacity
5 to compare the rate of successful pacemaker lead implantation complications and chronic electrical performance of RVS versus RVA pacing
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None
Secondary IDs
| Secondary ID | Type | Domain | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| HSREB 10880 | OTHER | UWO Ethics | None |