Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 3:51 AM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 11:40 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02395419
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2016-10-17
First Post:
2015-03-10
Brief Title:
A Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using the Totaltrack vs the Airtraq Laryngoscope in Routine Airway Management
Sponsor:
Manuel Ángel Gómez-Ríos
Organization:
Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña
Study Overview
Official Title:
None
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2016-10
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Endotracheal intubation is usually required to allow unrestricted surgical approach The Macintosh laryngoscope is the standard method However in certain situations as difficult airway this technique is ineffective and poorly tolerated by the patient Fiberoptic intubation is the gold standard in this scenario however sometimes it is not possible due to failure or unavailability so alternatives are needed The TotalTrack MedComflow SA Barcelona Spain and the Airtraq Prodol Meditec Vizcaya España been designed specifically for the airway management However despite their use in clinical practice there are no comparative studies
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None