Viewing Study NCT07361718


Ignite Creation Date: 2026-03-26 @ 3:20 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-04-01 @ 2:27 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT07361718
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2026-01-23
First Post: 2025-11-21
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Comparison Between Two Medical Devices for the Reconditioning of Lungs Intended for Transplantation
Sponsor: IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Comparison Between Two Medical Devices for the Reconditioning of Lung Grafts: Pilot Study EVOLUTION (Ex viVO Lung perfUsion for Lung Transplantation)
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2025-12
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: EVOLUTION
Brief Summary: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of two medical devices ( XPS XVIVO and OCS Transmedics) used for organ reperfusion in patients needing bilateral lung transplants from marginal donors.
Detailed Description: Marginal organs, which do not have ideal transplant characteristics but are not rejected, can be treated with ex-vivo reperfusion and reventilation machines to optimize their condition. The two main devices studied are:

Organ Care System (OCS) Transmedics, a mobile machine for use at the donor site.

XPS XVIVO, a static machine used for organs transported with cold preservation. The study's primary objective is to assess the acceptance rate of organs treated with these devices, while secondary objectives include comparing the duration of mechanical ventilation, ECMO use, and 90-day survival rates in transplanted patients.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: