Ignite Creation Date:
2026-03-26 @ 3:20 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-31 @ 12:06 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07392320
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2026-02-06
First Post:
2026-01-26
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
A Phase II Trial Comparing Immunotherapy Versus Capecitabine Maintenance After Chemo-chemoradiotherapy for High-risk Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Sponsor:
Sun Yat-sen University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase II Clinical Study Comparing Immunotherapy Combined With Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Immunotherapy Maintenance Versus Capecitabine Maintenance in Locally Advanced High-Risk Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2026-02
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
In this study, the investigators designed a randomized, open-label, phase II clinical trial for high-risk locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (T4 or N3 or EBV DNA ≥1500 copies/ml, AJCC 9th edition) that is sensitive to chemotherapy and PD-1 monoclonal antibody therapy. The trial compares sequential treatment with the TP regimen combined with PD-1 monoclonal antibody followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy and PD-1 maintenance therapy versus capecitabine maintenance therapy. The aim is to provide high-quality clinical evidence for optimizing the treatment strategy for high-risk locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Detailed Description:
For high-risk locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, it remains essential to explore more effective treatment strategies and regimens. In the era of immunotherapy, the introduction of PD-1 monoclonal antibodies has provided significant survival benefits to patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, different modes of intervention still warrant further exploration, and additional clinical evidence is needed for validation.
In this study, the investigators designed a randomized, open-label, phase II clinical trial focusing on high-risk locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (defined as T4 or N3 or EBV DNA ≥1500 copies/ml according to AJCC 9th edition) that is sensitive to chemotherapy and PD-1 monoclonal antibody therapy. The trial compares the sequential approach of TP regimen combined with PD-1 monoclonal antibody followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy and PD-1 maintenance therapy versus maintenance therapy with capecitabine. The study aims to provide high-quality clinical evidence to optimize treatment strategies for high-risk locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
In this study, the investigators designed a randomized, open-label, phase II clinical trial focusing on high-risk locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (defined as T4 or N3 or EBV DNA ≥1500 copies/ml according to AJCC 9th edition) that is sensitive to chemotherapy and PD-1 monoclonal antibody therapy. The trial compares the sequential approach of TP regimen combined with PD-1 monoclonal antibody followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy and PD-1 maintenance therapy versus maintenance therapy with capecitabine. The study aims to provide high-quality clinical evidence to optimize treatment strategies for high-risk locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: