Ignite Creation Date:
2026-03-26 @ 3:20 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-31 @ 11:49 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07436520
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2026-02-27
First Post:
2026-02-22
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Effect of Guide-Suture-Assisted Modified Fascial Closure on Postoperative Pain and Early Mobilization After Cesarean Section
Sponsor:
Necmettin Erbakan University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Effect of a Guide-Suture-Assisted Modified Fascial Closure Technique on Postoperative Pain and Early Mobilization After Cesarean Section: A Prospective, Single-Center, Randomized, Parallel-Group Trial With an Embedded Qualitative Component
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2026-02
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
GSMF-CS
Brief Summary:
This randomized controlled trial evaluates whether a guide-suture-assisted modified fascial closure technique reduces postoperative pain and improves early functional recovery compared with classical continuous fascial closure in women undergoing elective cesarean section.
Cesarean section is a common surgical procedure, and postoperative pain may delay mobilization and recovery. Fascial closure technique may influence postoperative pain by affecting tissue tension and alignment. The guide-suture-assisted modified closure technique is designed to improve fascial alignment and reduce mechanical tension during closure.
Participants undergoing elective cesarean section with Pfannenstiel incision are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either classical continuous fascial closure or guide-suture-assisted modified continuous fascial closure. Postoperative pain intensity is assessed using validated pain scales, and functional recovery is evaluated by measuring walking distance during the early postoperative period.
The study aims to determine whether this modified surgical technique improves postoperative comfort and facilitates earlier mobilization compared with the conventional technique.
Cesarean section is a common surgical procedure, and postoperative pain may delay mobilization and recovery. Fascial closure technique may influence postoperative pain by affecting tissue tension and alignment. The guide-suture-assisted modified closure technique is designed to improve fascial alignment and reduce mechanical tension during closure.
Participants undergoing elective cesarean section with Pfannenstiel incision are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either classical continuous fascial closure or guide-suture-assisted modified continuous fascial closure. Postoperative pain intensity is assessed using validated pain scales, and functional recovery is evaluated by measuring walking distance during the early postoperative period.
The study aims to determine whether this modified surgical technique improves postoperative comfort and facilitates earlier mobilization compared with the conventional technique.
Detailed Description:
This prospective, single-center, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial evaluates the effect of a guide-suture-assisted modified continuous fascial closure technique on postoperative pain and functional recovery following elective cesarean section.
Eligible participants include women aged 18 to 35 years undergoing elective cesarean section with Pfannenstiel incision. Participants are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either classical continuous fascial closure or guide-suture-assisted modified continuous fascial closure using a sealed-envelope randomization method.
All procedures are performed by the same experienced surgeon under spinal anesthesia using standardized surgical techniques. In the classical closure group, fascial closure is performed using continuous suturing with Vicryl 1-0 (polyglactin 910). In the modified closure group, a guide suture is first placed at the intended terminal corner of the fascial incision to improve alignment and reduce tissue tension, followed by continuous fascial closure using the same suture material.
Postoperative pain is assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery. Functional recovery is evaluated by measuring walking distance at the same time points. Postoperative analgesic use within 48 hours is also recorded.
The primary objective is to evaluate whether the modified fascial closure technique reduces early postoperative pain compared with classical continuous closure. Secondary objectives include assessment of functional recovery and analgesic requirements.
This study provides evidence regarding a simple surgical modification that may improve postoperative recovery following cesarean section.
Eligible participants include women aged 18 to 35 years undergoing elective cesarean section with Pfannenstiel incision. Participants are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either classical continuous fascial closure or guide-suture-assisted modified continuous fascial closure using a sealed-envelope randomization method.
All procedures are performed by the same experienced surgeon under spinal anesthesia using standardized surgical techniques. In the classical closure group, fascial closure is performed using continuous suturing with Vicryl 1-0 (polyglactin 910). In the modified closure group, a guide suture is first placed at the intended terminal corner of the fascial incision to improve alignment and reduce tissue tension, followed by continuous fascial closure using the same suture material.
Postoperative pain is assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery. Functional recovery is evaluated by measuring walking distance at the same time points. Postoperative analgesic use within 48 hours is also recorded.
The primary objective is to evaluate whether the modified fascial closure technique reduces early postoperative pain compared with classical continuous closure. Secondary objectives include assessment of functional recovery and analgesic requirements.
This study provides evidence regarding a simple surgical modification that may improve postoperative recovery following cesarean section.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: