Viewing Study NCT07399834


Ignite Creation Date: 2026-03-26 @ 3:19 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-03-31 @ 3:23 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT07399834
Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Last Update Posted: 2026-02-10
First Post: 2026-01-20
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Comparison of Single Tunnel Versus Double Tunnel Techniques for Coracoclavicular Stabilization in Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries
Sponsor: Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Thailand
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Comparison of Single Tunnel Versus Double Tunnel Techniques for Coracoclavicular Stabilization in Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries, A Randomized Controlled Trial
Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Status Verified Date: 2026-02
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The study conducted to compare both clinical and radiological outcomes comparing two techniques of Coracoclavicular-stabilization; single and double tunnel technique
Detailed Description: There are now over 150 techniques of operative treatment for Acromioclavicular joint injury. Despite no techniques used nowadays is recommended as gold standard treatment, most surgeons prefer Coracoclavicular-stabilization technique. Coracoclavicular-stabilization, providing favorable outcomes in many studies, regularly conducted with two surgical techniques which are single tunnel technique and double technique. Although, both techniques result in good biomechanic, patients underwent double tunnel technique report better clinical outcome. However, double tunnel technique compared to single tunnel technique is more challenging in surgical steps and risk intraoperative complications. This trial aims to compare both clinical and radiological outcomes of the two mentioned Coracoclavicular-stabilization techniques, in order to provide data to support treatment decision in patient with acute Acromioclavicular joint injury.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: