Viewing Study NCT07397234


Ignite Creation Date: 2026-03-26 @ 3:19 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-03-31 @ 1:12 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT07397234
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2026-02-09
First Post: 2026-02-02
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Thyroid Cartilage Plane VS Superior Laryngeal Nerve Space Block in Awake Tracheal Intubation
Sponsor: Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Thyroid Cartilage Plane Versus Superior Laryngeal Nerve Space for Ultrasound-guided Superior Laryngeal Nerve Block in Awake Tracheal Intubation: a Randomised Non-inferiority Clinical Trial
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2026-02
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided thyroid cartilage plane approach with the superior laryngeal nerve space approach for superior laryngeal nerve block in awake tracheal intubation. Patients were randomized into the thyroid cartilage plane block group (T group) or the superior laryngeal nerve space block group (C group). In Group T, bilateral thyroid cartilage plane block was performed under ultrasound with thyroid cartilage as the landmark, and local anesthetic was injected on the surface of the thyroid cartilage. In Group C, local anesthetic was injected into the space between the thyrohyoid membrane and muscle groups above.

We aim to evaluate whether the thyroid cartilage plane approach is not inferior to the superior laryngeal nerve space approach for ultrasound-guided superior laryngeal nerve block in awake tracheal intubation
Detailed Description: After entering the operation room, ECG, SPO2, and invasive blood pressure were monitored. Sedation was facilitated. The proper anaesthesia depth was maintained at 60-80 using the bispectral index. Additionally, 0.5 mg of Penehyclidine Hydrochloride was injected intravenously once the venous access was established. 100% oxygen 4 L min-1 was administered with a nasal cannula throughout the procedure. All patients received topical pharyngeal anesthesia using lidocaine spray. We used a 5-12 MHz linear probeto perform bilateral block. The probe was placed parasagittally to locate the thyroid cartilage and superior laryngeal nerve space. After identification of related structure, we advanced a 22-gauge needle medial to the transducer at the upper half of the thyroid cartilage laminae until it touched the laminae or superior laryngeal nerve space using the out-of-plane technique. The correct location of the needle tip in the fascial deep to the muscle groups was confirmed by injecting 0.5-1 ml saline. A total of 2% lidocaine 2.5 ml was administered after negative aspiration bilaterally. "Spray-as-you-go" technique guided by a fiberoptic bronchoscope was performed to the tracheal with 5 ml of 2% lidocaine. After airway anesthesia, intubation completed.

The primary outcome was the proportion of acceptable intubation conditions (AIC). Secondary outcomes were the performance time, Ramsay sedation score, the patient's cough condition, comfort score, and tracheal tube tolerance score and other perioperative complications including airway hemorrhage and superior laryngeal nerve damage.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: