Ignite Creation Date:
2026-03-26 @ 3:19 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-31 @ 7:20 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07381660
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2026-02-02
First Post:
2026-01-16
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
SBRT Versus Surgical Resection for Small HCC
Sponsor:
Sun Yat-sen University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) Versus Surgical Resection in Patients With Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Phase III, Open-label, Randomized Controlled Trial
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2026-01
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related incidence and mortality in China and represents a major public health challenge. Surgical resection is the most commonly used curative treatment for HCC and can provide favorable long-term outcomes. However, resection is associated with substantial perioperative morbidity, and its applicability is limited in certain patient populations, including those with recurrent disease, those who have undergone conversion therapy, and those with significant coexisting medical conditions.
Advances in radiotherapy technology and the development of highly precise delivery techniques have led to the increasing use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the management of HCC, particularly in patients with small tumors. Randomized controlled trials conducted by our group have shown that, in patients with recurrent small HCC, SBRT provides superior local tumor control compared with radiofrequency ablation. These findings suggest that SBRT may represent a potentially curative treatment option for selected patients with small HCC.
On the basis of this evidence, the present study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of surgical resection and SBRT in patients with small HCC. Patients with a solitary tumor measuring 5 cm or less in maximum diameter will be randomly assigned to undergo either surgical resection or SBRT. The primary end point of the study is overall survival. This trial aims to define the relative benefits and risks of these two treatment strategies and to provide high-quality evidence to inform clinical decision making and future guideline recommendations.
Advances in radiotherapy technology and the development of highly precise delivery techniques have led to the increasing use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the management of HCC, particularly in patients with small tumors. Randomized controlled trials conducted by our group have shown that, in patients with recurrent small HCC, SBRT provides superior local tumor control compared with radiofrequency ablation. These findings suggest that SBRT may represent a potentially curative treatment option for selected patients with small HCC.
On the basis of this evidence, the present study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of surgical resection and SBRT in patients with small HCC. Patients with a solitary tumor measuring 5 cm or less in maximum diameter will be randomly assigned to undergo either surgical resection or SBRT. The primary end point of the study is overall survival. This trial aims to define the relative benefits and risks of these two treatment strategies and to provide high-quality evidence to inform clinical decision making and future guideline recommendations.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: