Ignite Creation Date:
2026-03-26 @ 3:19 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-31 @ 1:22 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07319494
Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2026-01-06
First Post:
2025-11-30
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Advanced PRF vs PRF for Gap Filling in Immediate Implants
Sponsor:
Beni-Suef University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of Advanced Platelet Rich Fibrin Versus Platelet Rich Fibrin as a Gap Filling Material in Immediate Implant Placement
Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-12
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
A-PRF vs PRF
Brief Summary:
Study type: Clinical Trial
Goal:
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin (A-PRF) versus traditional Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) can improve bone healing and soft tissue outcomes in patients undergoing immediate dental implant placement.
Main questions it aims to answer:
Does A-PRF provide greater buccal bone preservation compared to PRF after immediate implant placement?
Does A-PRF improve soft tissue healing and reduce postoperative complications compared to PRF?
Comparison group:
Researchers will compare A-PRF to PRF as a gap-filling material in immediate implants to see if A-PRF results in better bone and soft tissue outcomes.
Participants will:
Undergo tooth extraction followed by immediate implant placement
Receive either A-PRF or PRF as the gap-filling material in the implant site
Have CBCT scans at baseline and 6 months to measure bone thickness
Have clinical assessments of soft tissue healing and implant stability
Attend follow-up visits at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-surgery
Goal:
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin (A-PRF) versus traditional Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) can improve bone healing and soft tissue outcomes in patients undergoing immediate dental implant placement.
Main questions it aims to answer:
Does A-PRF provide greater buccal bone preservation compared to PRF after immediate implant placement?
Does A-PRF improve soft tissue healing and reduce postoperative complications compared to PRF?
Comparison group:
Researchers will compare A-PRF to PRF as a gap-filling material in immediate implants to see if A-PRF results in better bone and soft tissue outcomes.
Participants will:
Undergo tooth extraction followed by immediate implant placement
Receive either A-PRF or PRF as the gap-filling material in the implant site
Have CBCT scans at baseline and 6 months to measure bone thickness
Have clinical assessments of soft tissue healing and implant stability
Attend follow-up visits at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-surgery
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: