Viewing Study NCT07338058


Ignite Creation Date: 2026-03-26 @ 3:18 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-03-31 @ 1:52 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT07338058
Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2026-01-13
First Post: 2026-01-03
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: High-Intensity Exercise Snacks for Reducing Mobile Phone Addiction in Adolescents
Sponsor: Jinan University Guangzhou
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Effect of Fragmented Exercise Snacks on Mobile Phone Addiction and Psychophysical Health in Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2026-01
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: ES-MPA
Brief Summary: This study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of "Exercise Snacks" (fragmented, high-intensity bouts of exercise) in reducing mobile phone addiction among adolescents.

Participants will be randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a control group. The intervention spans 5 months and is followed by a 1-month follow-up period (Month 6). The intervention group will perform short bursts of exercise (e.g., 1-minute sprints, squats) multiple times daily during school breaks. The program is divided into three progressive phases: adaptation, enhancement, and consolidation. The study aims to determine whether this sustained "snack-style" exercise regimen can significantly lower mobile phone addiction scores, improve physical fitness, and enhance psychological traits such as self-control and resilience over a semester-long period.
Detailed Description: Background and Rationale: Adolescents face increasing risks of mobile phone addiction, which is associated with sedentary behavior. "Exercise Snacks"-isolated bouts of vigorous exercise performed periodically throughout the day-offer a time-efficient solution. This study applies the COMB model and Self-Determination Theory to a long-term, semester-based intervention.

Study Design: This is a single-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted over a 6-month period (5 months of intervention + 1 month of follow-up).

Intervention Protocol: The intervention group follows a progressive "Exercise Snacks" program:

Adaptation Phase (Month 1 / Weeks 1-4): Focus on habit formation. Participants perform "Sprint Snacks" (e.g., stair climbing) 3 times daily and "Strength Snacks" (e.g., squats) 2 times weekly. Intensity is monitored to ensure safety and correct posture.

Enhancement Phase (Months 2-3 / Weeks 5-12): Focus on physiological adaptation. Frequency increases to 4 daily Sprint Snacks and 3 weekly Strength Snacks. A weekly collective High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) session is introduced to maximize cardiorespiratory benefits.

Consolidation Phase (Months 4-5 / Weeks 13-20): Focus on psychological integration. Daily snacks continue. Collective HIIT sessions increase to twice weekly. A cognitive-behavioral guidance component is added (bi-weekly) to help students identify phone use triggers and internalize healthy behaviors.

Follow-up Phase (Month 6 / Weeks 21-24): The structured intervention ceases. Participants are encouraged to maintain self-guided exercise. Final assessments are conducted at the end of Month 6 to evaluate the retention of intervention effects and any "rebound" in mobile phone addiction.

Outcome Measures: The primary outcome is Mobile Phone Addiction (SAS-SV), assessed at baseline, Month 3, Month 5 (post-intervention), and Month 6 (follow-up). Secondary outcomes include physical activity levels (PARS-3 and wearables), self-control (BSCS), resilience (RSCA), and mental health status.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:

Secondary ID Infos

Secondary ID Type Domain Link View
SBRE-25-0472 OTHER Survey and Behavioural Research Ethics Committee of The Chinese University of Hong Kong View