Ignite Creation Date:
2026-03-26 @ 3:18 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-31 @ 1:33 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07422558
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2026-02-20
First Post:
2026-02-13
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Intravenous Nalbuphine Versus Lidocaine for Prevention of Propofol Injection Pain
Sponsor:
Hayatabad Medical Complex
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comprasion of Intravenous Nalbuphine Versus Lidocaine in Reducing Propofol -Induced Injection Pain During General Surgery Procedure
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2026-02
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Propofol is a commonly used intravenous anesthetic agent, but its administration is frequently associated with injection pain, causing patient discomfort and agitation. Various pharmacological agents have been used to reduce this pain, including nalbuphine and lidocaine; however, results from previous studies remain conflicting. This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness of intravenous nalbuphine versus intravenous lidocaine in reducing the frequency of propofol-induced injection pain in patients undergoing elective general surgery procedures.
Detailed Description:
Propofol-induced injection pain is a common and undesirable adverse effect that can lead to patient distress during induction of anesthesia. Nalbuphine, a kappa-opioid receptor agonist and partial mu-opioid receptor antagonist, and lidocaine, a sodium channel blocker, have both been used to reduce this pain, but evidence regarding their comparative effectiveness remains inconsistent.
This randomized clinical trial will be conducted in the Department of Anesthesiology, PGMI / Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar. A total of 92 adult patients with ASA physical status I-II, scheduled for elective general surgery under general anesthesia, will be enrolled and randomized into two equal groups. Group A will receive intravenous nalbuphine at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg, while Group B will receive intravenous lidocaine at a dose of 4.5 mg/kg (maximum 300 mg), administered 60 seconds prior to induction with propofol. Injection pain will be assessed by the inducing anesthesiologist using a four-point pai
This randomized clinical trial will be conducted in the Department of Anesthesiology, PGMI / Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar. A total of 92 adult patients with ASA physical status I-II, scheduled for elective general surgery under general anesthesia, will be enrolled and randomized into two equal groups. Group A will receive intravenous nalbuphine at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg, while Group B will receive intravenous lidocaine at a dose of 4.5 mg/kg (maximum 300 mg), administered 60 seconds prior to induction with propofol. Injection pain will be assessed by the inducing anesthesiologist using a four-point pai
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: