Ignite Creation Date:
2026-03-26 @ 3:18 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-31 @ 5:43 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07433751
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2026-03-04
First Post:
2026-02-19
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Ultrasound Estimation of Fetal Macrosomia at Term: Diagnostic Accuracy Within 24 Hours of Delivery
Sponsor:
Centre Hospitalier Henri Duffaut - Avignon
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
ECHO-MACRO : Ultrasound Estimation of Fetal Macrosomia at Term: Diagnostic Accuracy Within 24 Hours of Delivery
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2026-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
ECHO-MACRO
Brief Summary:
Obstetric ultrasonography is now an essential tool for monitoring pregnancy. In France, three ultrasounds are recommended during a singleton pregnancy (at 12, 22, and 32 weeks of amenorrhea) to improve maternal and neonatal care. Among the parameters studied, fetal weight estimation allows for the assessment of fetal growth and the detection of certain conditions such as intrauterine growth restriction or macrosomia.
Fetal weight estimation is based primarily on the Hadlock formula, which combines several biometric measurements (head circumference, abdominal circumference, and femur length). This estimate has a margin of error of 6 to 10% compared to birth weight, which is still accurate enough to guide important medical decisions, such as inducing labor or performing a cesarean section. However, an estimation error can have negative consequences for both mother and child.
Fetal macrosomia is defined as a birth weight greater than or equal to 4000 g. It affects approximately 5 to 10% of pregnancies. Screening is mainly based on ultrasound, particularly in the second and third trimesters.
Macrosomia is associated with an increased risk of complications for the mother (cesarean section, postpartum hemorrhage, or deep vein thrombosis) and the child (shoulder dystocia, fractures, brachial plexus palsy, or neonatal asphyxia). These risks are increased in cases of macrosomia in the context of maternal diabetes.
Within the gynecology-obstetrics department, physicians use the protocole of macrosomia screening described in the DAME trial. If macrosomia is suspected an additional ultrasound is performed at around 36 weeks of amenorrhea. The Hadlock formula is used to estimate fetal weight. The ultrasound criteria for suspecting macrosomia are an estimated fetal weight above the 95th percentile (90th percentile in cases of maternal diabetes) according to WHO curves. In these cases, induction is offered between 38 and 39 weeks of amenorrhea, if the cervix is favorable. A cesarean section is offered to the patient if the estimated fetal weight is greater than 5000 g in the absence of diabetes and greater than 4500 g in cases of associated diabetes.
Nevertheless, the probability of a child being born macrosomic after ultrasound suspicion is between 17% and 80% on average, and 53% in our center. Although beneficial in the context of macrosomia, the effects of induced labor or cesarean delivery are not insignificant for the mother and her baby. In this context, the value of this study is to demonstrate that performing an ultrasound as close to the birth as possible could allow for a more reliable estimation of fetal weight and better detection of macrosomia in order to avoid unnecessary procedures.
The investigators hypothesize that fetal weight estimation is more accurate when performed within 24 hours prior to delivery. When the assessment is conducted earlier, it inherently assumes a constant fetal growth rate until birth, which may not reflect actual growth patterns. A more precise estimation of birth weight could improve clinical decision-making and optimize maternal and neonatal care, potentially reducing unnecessary interventions such as labor induction or cesarean delivery.
Fetal weight estimation is based primarily on the Hadlock formula, which combines several biometric measurements (head circumference, abdominal circumference, and femur length). This estimate has a margin of error of 6 to 10% compared to birth weight, which is still accurate enough to guide important medical decisions, such as inducing labor or performing a cesarean section. However, an estimation error can have negative consequences for both mother and child.
Fetal macrosomia is defined as a birth weight greater than or equal to 4000 g. It affects approximately 5 to 10% of pregnancies. Screening is mainly based on ultrasound, particularly in the second and third trimesters.
Macrosomia is associated with an increased risk of complications for the mother (cesarean section, postpartum hemorrhage, or deep vein thrombosis) and the child (shoulder dystocia, fractures, brachial plexus palsy, or neonatal asphyxia). These risks are increased in cases of macrosomia in the context of maternal diabetes.
Within the gynecology-obstetrics department, physicians use the protocole of macrosomia screening described in the DAME trial. If macrosomia is suspected an additional ultrasound is performed at around 36 weeks of amenorrhea. The Hadlock formula is used to estimate fetal weight. The ultrasound criteria for suspecting macrosomia are an estimated fetal weight above the 95th percentile (90th percentile in cases of maternal diabetes) according to WHO curves. In these cases, induction is offered between 38 and 39 weeks of amenorrhea, if the cervix is favorable. A cesarean section is offered to the patient if the estimated fetal weight is greater than 5000 g in the absence of diabetes and greater than 4500 g in cases of associated diabetes.
Nevertheless, the probability of a child being born macrosomic after ultrasound suspicion is between 17% and 80% on average, and 53% in our center. Although beneficial in the context of macrosomia, the effects of induced labor or cesarean delivery are not insignificant for the mother and her baby. In this context, the value of this study is to demonstrate that performing an ultrasound as close to the birth as possible could allow for a more reliable estimation of fetal weight and better detection of macrosomia in order to avoid unnecessary procedures.
The investigators hypothesize that fetal weight estimation is more accurate when performed within 24 hours prior to delivery. When the assessment is conducted earlier, it inherently assumes a constant fetal growth rate until birth, which may not reflect actual growth patterns. A more precise estimation of birth weight could improve clinical decision-making and optimize maternal and neonatal care, potentially reducing unnecessary interventions such as labor induction or cesarean delivery.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: