Ignite Creation Date:
2026-03-26 @ 3:17 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-31 @ 9:04 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07489469
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2026-03-24
First Post:
2026-03-09
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Effectiveness of an AI Scribe Compared to Routine Templates for Clinical Documentation in Orthopedic Consultations
Sponsor:
University of Saskatchewan
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Effectiveness of an AI Scribe Compared to Routine Templates for Clinical Documentation in Orthopedic Consultations: A Randomized Study
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2026-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This randomized study compares AI-generated clinical documentation with traditional dictation templates during orthopedic consultations. Patients are randomized to have their consultation documented using either an AI medical scribe or a routine dictation template. Outcomes include surgeon documentation time, administrative processing time, time from consultation to note delivery to the family physician, patient satisfaction, and documentation accuracy.
Detailed Description:
Clinical documentation is a necessary but time-consuming component of surgical practice. Traditional documentation relies on dictation templates that require manual transcription and editing by administrative staff. Artificial intelligence (AI) medical scribes have been developed to automate documentation by recording and transcribing consultations in real time.
The purpose of this randomized study is to compare the effectiveness of an AI scribe versus routine dictation templates in orthopedic consultations.
Patients undergoing consultation for total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty, or meniscal pathology will be invited to participate. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either AI-generated documentation or standard dictation template documentation. Consultations will otherwise occur according to usual clinical practice.
Data collected will include:
* Surgeon documentation time per patient encounter
* Administrative processing time
* Time from consultation to delivery of the consultation note to the family physician
* Patient satisfaction, including comfort with documentation methods and perceived usefulness of timely note availability
* Documentation accuracy, including spelling, grammar, completeness, and clinical correctness assessed by a blinded reviewer A total of 200 participants will be enrolled. Outcomes will be compared between groups using appropriate statistical tests with a significance level of p \< 0.05.
The purpose of this randomized study is to compare the effectiveness of an AI scribe versus routine dictation templates in orthopedic consultations.
Patients undergoing consultation for total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty, or meniscal pathology will be invited to participate. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either AI-generated documentation or standard dictation template documentation. Consultations will otherwise occur according to usual clinical practice.
Data collected will include:
* Surgeon documentation time per patient encounter
* Administrative processing time
* Time from consultation to delivery of the consultation note to the family physician
* Patient satisfaction, including comfort with documentation methods and perceived usefulness of timely note availability
* Documentation accuracy, including spelling, grammar, completeness, and clinical correctness assessed by a blinded reviewer A total of 200 participants will be enrolled. Outcomes will be compared between groups using appropriate statistical tests with a significance level of p \< 0.05.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: