Ignite Creation Date:
2026-03-26 @ 3:17 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-29 @ 11:37 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07364435
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2026-02-04
First Post:
2026-01-16
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Effect of Bed Bathing Methods on VRE Colonization in ICU Patients
Sponsor:
Özkan Kasap
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
The Effect of Two Different Bed Bathing Methods on Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus Colonization in Intensive Care Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2026-02
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effects of two different bed bathing methods on vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) colonization in adult intensive care unit patients. A total of 210 patients were randomly assigned to receive either daily whole-body bathing with 4% chlorhexidine gluconate solution or daily bed bathing using disposable antibacterial body wipes. VRE colonization was monitored using skin swab cultures collected on days 7, 14, and 21. The results of this study may contribute to infection prevention strategies in intensive care units by identifying effective hygiene practices for reducing VRE colonization.
Detailed Description:
This study was designed as a randomized controlled trial conducted in the general intensive care units of a tertiary care hospital. Adult patients meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to one of two parallel groups. The experimental group received daily whole-body bed bathing with a 4% chlorhexidine gluconate solution, while the control group received daily bed bathing using disposable antibacterial body cleansing wipes.
Randomization was performed to ensure comparable baseline characteristics between the groups. VRE colonization was assessed through skin swab cultures obtained at baseline and subsequently on days 7, 14, and 21. The primary outcome of the study was the rate of VRE colonization over time. Secondary analyses included the evaluation of patient-related factors such as age, length of stay, body mass index, and previous VRE history.
All procedures were performed by trained nursing staff according to standardized protocols. The study was conducted following ethical approval obtained from the institutional ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained in accordance with ethical standards. The findings of this study aim to support evidence-based infection control practices in intensive care nursing.
Randomization was performed to ensure comparable baseline characteristics between the groups. VRE colonization was assessed through skin swab cultures obtained at baseline and subsequently on days 7, 14, and 21. The primary outcome of the study was the rate of VRE colonization over time. Secondary analyses included the evaluation of patient-related factors such as age, length of stay, body mass index, and previous VRE history.
All procedures were performed by trained nursing staff according to standardized protocols. The study was conducted following ethical approval obtained from the institutional ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained in accordance with ethical standards. The findings of this study aim to support evidence-based infection control practices in intensive care nursing.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: