Ignite Creation Date:
2026-03-26 @ 3:17 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-30 @ 12:09 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07491432
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2026-03-24
First Post:
2026-03-18
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Effects of Lower Extremity Neural Mobilization on Gait Biomechanics and Spinal Alignment
Sponsor:
Izmir Democracy University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Acute Effects of Lower Extremity Neural Mobilization on Gait Biomechanics and Spinal Alignment: A Comparison of Neural Slider and Neural Tensioner Techniques
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2026-02
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This randomized controlled single-blinded trial aimed to compare the immediate effects of lower extremity neural slider and neural tensioner exercises on gait parameters and spinal alignment in sedentary young adults. Sixty healthy sedentary individuals aged 18-30 years were randomly assigned to receive either a neural slider or neural tensioner intervention. Spatiotemporal gait parameters were assessed using a validated smartphone-based gait analysis application, and spinal alignment angles were measured with a bubble inclinometer before and immediately after a single exercise session. The primary outcome was the acute change in gait-related parameters, and secondary outcomes included changes in spinal alignment and pelvic inclination angles.
Detailed Description:
This randomized controlled, single-blinded experimental study was conducted between February and April 2024 to investigate the acute effects of lower extremity neural mobilization techniques on gait biomechanics and spinal alignment in sedentary individuals.
Sixty healthy sedentary participants (30 females, 30 males) aged 18-30 years were enrolled. Participants were randomly allocated to either a neural slider group or a neural tensioner group using a sealed-envelope randomization method. Allocation concealment was ensured by an independent researcher, and all outcome assessments were performed by a blinded physiotherapist.
Each participant underwent baseline (pre-test) assessments followed by a single session of neural mobilization exercise (3 minutes total, 3 sets of 30 repetitions). Post-intervention measurements were performed five minutes after completion of the exercise.
The primary outcome was the immediate change in spatiotemporal gait parameters, including gait speed, cadence, step length, step length asymmetry, base of support, single and double support times, and gait score. Gait was assessed using the OneStep smartphone application, which has demonstrated high validity compared to laboratory-based gait analysis systems.
Secondary outcomes included changes in spinal alignment and pelvic inclination angles, measured using a bubble inclinometer. Cervical lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, total spinal mobility, and pelvic tilt angles were evaluated in neutral standing position.
No adverse events were reported during or after the interventions.
Sixty healthy sedentary participants (30 females, 30 males) aged 18-30 years were enrolled. Participants were randomly allocated to either a neural slider group or a neural tensioner group using a sealed-envelope randomization method. Allocation concealment was ensured by an independent researcher, and all outcome assessments were performed by a blinded physiotherapist.
Each participant underwent baseline (pre-test) assessments followed by a single session of neural mobilization exercise (3 minutes total, 3 sets of 30 repetitions). Post-intervention measurements were performed five minutes after completion of the exercise.
The primary outcome was the immediate change in spatiotemporal gait parameters, including gait speed, cadence, step length, step length asymmetry, base of support, single and double support times, and gait score. Gait was assessed using the OneStep smartphone application, which has demonstrated high validity compared to laboratory-based gait analysis systems.
Secondary outcomes included changes in spinal alignment and pelvic inclination angles, measured using a bubble inclinometer. Cervical lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, total spinal mobility, and pelvic tilt angles were evaluated in neutral standing position.
No adverse events were reported during or after the interventions.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: