Ignite Creation Date:
2026-03-26 @ 3:16 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-31 @ 9:56 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07341932
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2026-01-15
First Post:
2026-01-06
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Helium-free Magnetocardiography Guided Therapy for Stable Coronary Artery Disease - A Randomized Controlled Trial
Sponsor:
Beijing Anzhen Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Helium-free Magnetocardiography Guided Therapy for Stable Coronary Artery Disease - A Randomized Controlled Trial
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-12
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This rigorously designed randomized controlled trial aims to investigate whether Magnetocardiography (MCG) can optimize the clinical pathway, improve quality of life, and reduce healthcare costs in patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) within real-world clinical settings, thereby generating evidence for the future application of MCG in clinical decision-making pathways.
Stable CAD patients with at least one major coronary vessel showing 50%-90% stenosis on coronary CTA will be enrolled based on predefined criteria. Stratified by study center and using a central web-based randomization system, participants will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either the \*\*MCG-guided group\*\* (where treatment recommendations for invasive coronary angiography \[ICA\] or optimal medical therapy are based on MCG results) or the \*\*conventional management group\*\* (where treatment strategy is based on stenosis severity, pre-test probability, and functional test results).
The study will proceed with the following evaluations:
1. Compare the proportion of patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease on planned ICA performed within 90 days between the two groups, testing the hypothesis that this proportion is lower in the MCG-guided group.
2. Conduct telephone follow-ups at 90 days, 6 months, and 12 months post-enrollment to compare between-group differences in the rate of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE), Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) scores, and total healthcare expenditures during the follow-up period.
Stable CAD patients with at least one major coronary vessel showing 50%-90% stenosis on coronary CTA will be enrolled based on predefined criteria. Stratified by study center and using a central web-based randomization system, participants will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either the \*\*MCG-guided group\*\* (where treatment recommendations for invasive coronary angiography \[ICA\] or optimal medical therapy are based on MCG results) or the \*\*conventional management group\*\* (where treatment strategy is based on stenosis severity, pre-test probability, and functional test results).
The study will proceed with the following evaluations:
1. Compare the proportion of patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease on planned ICA performed within 90 days between the two groups, testing the hypothesis that this proportion is lower in the MCG-guided group.
2. Conduct telephone follow-ups at 90 days, 6 months, and 12 months post-enrollment to compare between-group differences in the rate of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE), Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) scores, and total healthcare expenditures during the follow-up period.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
Secondary ID Infos
| Secondary ID | Type | Domain | Link | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024AZB1003 | OTHER_GRANT | Beijing Anzhen Hosptial, Capital Medical University | View |