Ignite Creation Date:
2026-03-26 @ 3:16 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-30 @ 1:32 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07439757
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2026-02-27
First Post:
2026-02-23
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
AI-Powered Precision Decision-Making for Pancreatic Diseases
Sponsor:
Changhai Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Multicenter Clinical Study on AI-Powered Precision Decision-Making Management for Pancreatic Diseases Using Contrast-Enhanced CT
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2026-02
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This multicenter clinical trial evaluates an artificial intelligence (AI) system designed to assist in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic diseases. Using contrast-enhanced CT scans, the study compares the AI's recommendations against the decisions of experienced clinicians to verify the system's accuracy and safety in a real-world setting. Patients are categorized into three management groups: Intervention (surgery/treatment), Intensive Surveillance (close monitoring), or Routine Surveillance (standard follow-up). The primary goal is to determine if the AI system can reliably classify patients, reduce the risk of missing malignant lesions, and prevent unnecessary surgeries, thereby improving clinical decision-making for pancreatic conditions.
Detailed Description:
MEHTOD： This multicenter clinical trial evaluates the reliability and effectiveness of an AI system for patients with pancreatic diseases in a real-world clinical environment. The study calculates the AI system's classification accuracy using pathological diagnosis (biopsy/surgery results) or long-term follow-up as the "gold standard" for comparison. Additionally, the safety and clinical utility of the management strategies recommended by the AI are assessed by measuring the risk of missing malignant lesions, the rate of unnecessary surgeries for pancreatic diseases, and the level of agreement with traditional clinical decisions.
STUDY DESIGN
All contrast-enhanced CT images from patients with pancreatic diseases are analyzed by the AI system to generate a classification result (Intervention, Intensive Surveillance, or Routine Surveillance). Simultaneously, clinical doctors review the same data and categorize patients into these three groups to determine their actual care plan:
1. INTERVENTION: Patients assessed by doctors as needing "Intervention" are recommended for further surgical evaluation or treatment.
2. INTENSIVE SURVEILLANCE: Patients assessed by doctors as needing "Intensive Surveillance" receive a personalized, high-frequency follow-up plan until the study endpoint.
3. ROUTINE SURVEILLANCE: Patients assessed by doctors as needing "Routine Surveillance" undergo follow-up for at least one year. If abnormalities arise during this period, the patient is transferred to the appropriate "Intervention" or "Intensive Surveillance" protocol.
OUTCOMES： The study compares the performance of the AI system against clinical doctors regarding classification accuracy, the risk of missed diagnoses, unnecessary surgery rates, and decision consistency. These metrics are used to validate the AI system's value, safety, and utility in the clinical management of pancreatic diseases.
STUDY DESIGN
All contrast-enhanced CT images from patients with pancreatic diseases are analyzed by the AI system to generate a classification result (Intervention, Intensive Surveillance, or Routine Surveillance). Simultaneously, clinical doctors review the same data and categorize patients into these three groups to determine their actual care plan:
1. INTERVENTION: Patients assessed by doctors as needing "Intervention" are recommended for further surgical evaluation or treatment.
2. INTENSIVE SURVEILLANCE: Patients assessed by doctors as needing "Intensive Surveillance" receive a personalized, high-frequency follow-up plan until the study endpoint.
3. ROUTINE SURVEILLANCE: Patients assessed by doctors as needing "Routine Surveillance" undergo follow-up for at least one year. If abnormalities arise during this period, the patient is transferred to the appropriate "Intervention" or "Intensive Surveillance" protocol.
OUTCOMES： The study compares the performance of the AI system against clinical doctors regarding classification accuracy, the risk of missed diagnoses, unnecessary surgery rates, and decision consistency. These metrics are used to validate the AI system's value, safety, and utility in the clinical management of pancreatic diseases.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: