Ignite Creation Date:
2026-03-26 @ 3:15 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-03-30 @ 2:50 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07453966
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2026-03-06
First Post:
2026-02-13
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Efficacy and Safety of Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation in Patients With Pulmonary Infection Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
Sponsor:
Zhongnan Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Efficacy and Safety of Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation in Patients With Pulmonary Infection Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Assessed by Electrical Impedance Tomography: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2026-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether adding intrapulmonary percussion ventilation (IPV) to standard airway clearance treatment improves clinical outcomes in invasively mechanically ventilated patients with pulmonary infection. It will also evaluate the safety of IPV in this population and assess changes in lung ventilation using electrical impedance tomography (EIT).
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does adding IPV shorten the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation compared with standard therapy alone? Does IPV improve regional and global lung ventilation? Does IPV improve clinical indicators, including oxygenation, lung mechanics, and pulmonary infection scores? Is IPV safe in mechanically ventilated patients with pulmonary infection?
Participants will:
Receive either standard therapy alone or standard therapy plus IPV Undergo serial EIT monitoring at predefined time points Receive routine clinical assessments and ventilator parameter monitoring during ICU stay Be followed until successful weaning, discharge, or completion of hospitalization
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does adding IPV shorten the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation compared with standard therapy alone? Does IPV improve regional and global lung ventilation? Does IPV improve clinical indicators, including oxygenation, lung mechanics, and pulmonary infection scores? Is IPV safe in mechanically ventilated patients with pulmonary infection?
Participants will:
Receive either standard therapy alone or standard therapy plus IPV Undergo serial EIT monitoring at predefined time points Receive routine clinical assessments and ventilator parameter monitoring during ICU stay Be followed until successful weaning, discharge, or completion of hospitalization
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
True
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
True
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: