Viewing Study NCT07418892


Ignite Creation Date: 2026-03-26 @ 3:15 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-03-30 @ 3:01 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT07418892
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2026-02-18
First Post: 2026-01-23
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Effects of Resisted Versus Unresisted Sprint Training on Sprint Force-Velocity Profile in Youth Footballers
Sponsor: Federal University of Vicosa
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Effects of Resisted Versus Non-resisted Sprint Training on Countermovement Jump and Sprint Force-velocity Profile in Youth Footballers: a Randomised Controlled Trial
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2026-01
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: RST-FV Youth F
Brief Summary: This randomised, controlled, two-arm trial evaluates whether light resisted sprint training (sled towing at 20% of body mass) produces superior improvements in 30 m sprint mechanical outputs compared with matched-dose unresisted sprint training in youth footballers.

Participants complete two supervised sessions per week for six consecutive weeks, integrated into normal academy microcycles on the same artificial-turf surface. Primary outcomes are changes in sprint-derived force-velocity-power profile parameters and 30 m sprint performance, with secondary outcomes including countermovement jump height and anthropometrics.
Detailed Description: The study uses a parallel-group randomised design. Allocation is stratified by squad category (Under-14 and Juvenile) with simple randomisation within strata using computer-generated random numbers prepared by a researcher not involved in training delivery.

The intervention is delivered on a third-generation artificial-turf pitch at a youth academy integrated within a professional development pathway. Forty-four outfield players from two squads are enrolled.

Both arms complete 20 m maximal sprints with identical volume and rest structure (3 sets × 5 repetitions, 45 s inter-repetition rest, 3 min inter-set rest). The experimental arm performs sled towing at 20% body mass (sled tare 3 kg plus plates), whereas the comparator arm performs unresisted maximal sprints. No additional lower-limb strength or speed work beyond the head coach's standard plan is introduced during the intervention period.

Primary outcomes are derived from 30 m sprint profiling, using high-speed video and the MySprint application to compute split times and estimate sprint mechanical variables within the Morin-Samozino framework. Outcome assessors/video analysts and the statistician are blinded to group codes, while full participant blinding is not feasible due to the presence of the sled.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: