Viewing Study NCT07425561


Ignite Creation Date: 2026-03-26 @ 3:14 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-03-30 @ 3:24 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT07425561
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2026-02-23
First Post: 2026-02-08
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Derivation and Validation of the Risk Evaluation Score for Pneumonia Involving Resistant Entities (RESPIRE)
Sponsor: Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Derivation and Validation of the Risk Evaluation Score for Pneumonia Involving Resistant Entities (RESPIRE)
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2026-02
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: RESPIRE
Brief Summary: This is a single-center, non-profit observational study with two sequential phases: an initial retrospective phase followed by a prospective phase. Patients were enrolled during two consecutive, non-overlapping periods.

The primary objective of the study is to derive a clinical predictive score for multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogen-related pneumonia in patients diagnosed with pneumonia presenting to the Emergency Department and/or admitted to the hospital from the community.
Detailed Description: Study Design and Setting

This is a single-center, non-profit observational study with two sequential phases: an initial retrospective phase and a subsequent prospective phase. Patients were enrolled during two consecutive, non-overlapping periods: from January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2023 (retrospective cohort), and from January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2025 (prospective cohort).

The study was conducted in a hospital setting and is monocentric, carried out at the Emergency Department and the Emergency Sub-Intensive Care Unit of Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, in collaboration with the Units of Microbiology and Virology and Infectious Diseases. Careggi is a large academic hospital that serves as the local hospital for a population of approximately 650,000 inhabitants and acts as a tertiary referral center for about 1,600,000 people.

Retrospective Phase (Derivation Cohort)

During the first observational retrospective phase (2 years), data were collected to establish a retrospective derivation cohort composed of patients with microbiologically confirmed etiological diagnoses of pneumonia. The derivation cohort includes patients who underwent microbiological investigations aimed at identifying the etiological diagnosis of pneumonia within the first 48 hours from admission to Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi.

Following an initial screening of microbiological test requests received by the Microbiology and Virology Laboratory-using dedicated software containing microbiological investigations and electronic medical records of patients with pneumonia-patients who underwent diagnostic testing to determine the etiological agent of pneumonia (bacterial, viral, or fungal) on respiratory samples (considered the diagnostic gold standard for etiological assessment) within 48 hours of hospital admission were identified. Subsequently, patients' medical records were reviewed by the investigators to construct the final cohort database.

During the retrospective phase, patients with microbiologically confirmed bacterial, fungal, or viral pneumonia were included in order to create the retrospective cohort. Cases in which no bacterial, fungal, or viral pathogen was identified were excluded. Only patients with positive culture results and available antimicrobial susceptibility testing were selected. Patients with bacterial pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens identified on culture constituted the study group, whereas patients with bacterial pneumonia caused by non-MDR pathogens constituted the control group. MDR pneumonia was defined as pneumonia caused by bacterial pathogens exhibiting acquired non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories.

Only patients with a confirmed etiological diagnosis of pneumonia and positive culture results were included, in order to avoid the inclusion of false-negative cases. Negative respiratory culture results (reported in the literature in approximately 40-60% of cases) could have introduced potential selection bias, as culture-negative results do not allow exclusion of pneumonia caused by MDR pathogens.

Prospective Phase (Validation Cohort)

During the second observational prospective phase (2 years), data were collected to establish a prospective cohort of Emergency Department patients, on which the performance of the clinical score derived from the retrospective cohort was evaluated in a purely observational manner.

The validation cohort includes patients diagnosed with pneumonia who underwent microbiological investigations on respiratory samples in the Emergency Department to assess the etiological agent. No additional diagnostic tests were performed beyond routine clinical practice. Only patients with pneumonia who underwent microbiological investigations on respiratory samples at the clinician's discretion were included. After an initial phase, only patients with positive respiratory culture results were included, for the same reasons described above.

The Units of Emergency Medicine and Surgery and Integrated Clinical Assessment and In-Hospital Emergency Pathways were responsible for patient assessment, enrollment, sample collection, and data collection. The Unit of Microbiology and Virology was responsible for identifying microbiological test requests received by the laboratory during the study period and for extracting microbiological data.

Study Objectives

The primary objective of the study is to derive a clinical predictive score for MDR pathogen-related pneumonia in patients diagnosed with pneumonia presenting to the Emergency Department and/or admitted to the hospital from the community.

Secondary objectives are:

1. validation of the derived clinical score in a prospective patient cohort;
2. comparison of the performance of the developed score in predicting MDR-related pneumonia with validated scores such as DRIP, Shorr, Park, Shindo, Aliberti, and Schreiber, as well as the ATS/IDSA HCAP criteria;
3. analysis of positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), specificity, sensitivity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-), and optimal cut-off values;
4. assessment of score calibration in both the derivation and validation cohorts;
5. evaluation of clinical impact using decision curve analysis.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: