Viewing Study NCT07337161


Ignite Creation Date: 2026-03-26 @ 3:14 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-03-31 @ 4:53 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT07337161
Status: RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2026-01-13
First Post: 2025-08-28
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Stereotactic Post-operative Radiotherapy for Intraparotid Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Sponsor: David Palma
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Stereotactic Post-operative Radiotherapy for Intraparotid Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Status: RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2026-01
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: SPRINT
Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and side effects of stereotactic radiotherapy (5 sessions) against conventional (standard) radiotherapy (20-30 sessions) for the treatment of skin cancer involving the head and neck after surgical resection.

Stereotactic radiotherapy works in the same way that conventional (standard) radiotherapy does to kill cancer cells by damaging their genetic material and stopping the cancer cells from making copies of themselves.

This study will help the study doctors find out if this different approach is the same, better, or worse than the standard of care for your cancer.
Detailed Description: This study is a phase II randomized trial where patients will be randomized in a 1:2 ratio to standard of care treatment with conventional fractionation PORT (Arm 1) vs. ultrahypofractionated stereotactic PORT (Arm 2). Patients will be stratified by pathologic nodal status (pN1 vs. pN2-pN3) per the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition staging and use of immunotherapy (classified as neoadjuvant immunotherapy (with or without adjuvant immunotherapy) vs. planned for adjuvant immunotherapy only vs. no immunotherapy. Patients randomized to Arm 2 will be also compared to historical control data for primary endpoint of tumor local control at 2-years.

The objective of this study is to assess the clinical efficacy, toxicity and QOL of ultra-hypofractionated SABR compared to conventional fractionation for adjuvant radiation following resection of locally advanced, node-positive cutaneous SCC of the head and neck.

Primary endpoint

\- Tumor control within the irradiated field at 2 years following adjuvant radiation completion defined as absence of clinical, radiographic or biopsy-proven recurrence within the irradiated field

Secondary endpoints

* Regional recurrence
* Disease-free survival (DFS)
* Overall survival (OS)
* Rate of salvage treatment (surgery in the ipsilateral neck) and freedom from unsalvageable recurrence in the ipsilateral parotid gland or neck
* Radiation-associated toxicity based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events(CTCAE) version 5.0
* Patient-reported outcomes using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Head and Neck Cancer (MDASI-HN) and the EuroQOL 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaires

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:

Secondary ID Infos

Secondary ID Type Domain Link View
15521 OTHER London Health Science Centre (LHSCRI) View