Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 12:11 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-27 @ 9:31 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05229861
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2022-06-14
First Post:
2022-01-14
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
The Influence of HIIT Versus MCT on Cardiorespiratory Fitness in PPMS
Sponsor:
Klinik Valens
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
The Influence of High-Intensity Interval Training Compared to Moderate Continuous Training on Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Symptom Improvement, and Disease-specific Biomarkers in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2022-06
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
CYPRO
Brief Summary:
Endurance training revealed to be an effective means to increase cardiorespiratory fitness in persons with Multiple Sclerosis (MS), considered relevant to health-related quality of life in this population. Moreover, endurance training improves MS-related symptoms, such as reduced walking capacity, fatigue, depression, and cognitive impairment. Owing to these benefits, endurance training has evolved as an integral part of MS rehabilitation, anchored in current treatment guidelines.
In recent years, High-Intensity Interval training (HIIT) evolved as a time-efficient and safe alternative to standard care in MS rehabilitation that is Moderate Continuous Training (MCT). Indeed, HIIT has already been proven superior to MCT in improving cardiorespiratory fitness, MS-related symptoms (e.g. cognitive impairment) and, beyond, seems to elicit disease-modifying effects on MS-pathophysiology (i.e. alleviated neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration).
However, current evidence is restricted to clinical trials that include samples with mixed MS disease courses, in which persons with primary progressive MS (PPMS) are underrepresented due to comparatively low prevalence rates.
Distinct pathophysiological mechanisms and symptom constellations prohibit the generalisation of previous findings to persons with PPMS. In this population, however, evidence-based rehabilitative strategies are urgently needed, as disability progression in PPMS is poorly responsive to pharmacotherapy.
This study, aims to validate previous findings on the superior effect of HIIT compared to MCT on improving cardiorespiratory fitness, MS-related symptoms and MS pathophysiology in persons with PPMS, contributing to the development of specific recommendations to maximize the effects of exercise as a potent non-pharmacological treatment adjuvant.
In recent years, High-Intensity Interval training (HIIT) evolved as a time-efficient and safe alternative to standard care in MS rehabilitation that is Moderate Continuous Training (MCT). Indeed, HIIT has already been proven superior to MCT in improving cardiorespiratory fitness, MS-related symptoms (e.g. cognitive impairment) and, beyond, seems to elicit disease-modifying effects on MS-pathophysiology (i.e. alleviated neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration).
However, current evidence is restricted to clinical trials that include samples with mixed MS disease courses, in which persons with primary progressive MS (PPMS) are underrepresented due to comparatively low prevalence rates.
Distinct pathophysiological mechanisms and symptom constellations prohibit the generalisation of previous findings to persons with PPMS. In this population, however, evidence-based rehabilitative strategies are urgently needed, as disability progression in PPMS is poorly responsive to pharmacotherapy.
This study, aims to validate previous findings on the superior effect of HIIT compared to MCT on improving cardiorespiratory fitness, MS-related symptoms and MS pathophysiology in persons with PPMS, contributing to the development of specific recommendations to maximize the effects of exercise as a potent non-pharmacological treatment adjuvant.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: