Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 2:28 AM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 11:19 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02053428
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2014-11-17
First Post:
2014-01-21
Brief Title:
Comparison of Percutaneous Image-guided Gastrostomies
Sponsor:
University Health Network Toronto
Organization:
University Health Network Toronto
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of Percutaneous Image-guided Gastrostomies A Single Centre Pilot Study
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2014-01
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Percutaneous image-guided gastrostomy PIG is an increasingly popular technique of creating gastroenteric access through the anterior abdominal wall for nutrition and or compression Large-bore mushroom-retained catheters via the pull technique and small-bore cope loop catheters via the push technique are both used at Interventional Radiology for PIG at our institution To date there is no guideline for PIG and no direct comparison of two PIG techniques The proposed pilot study is to compare the two different types of PIG techniques in head and neck cancer patients who require prophylactic enteral feeding by PIG The purpose of the study is to assess the feasibility of a large randomized clinical trial to compare these two PIG techniques
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None