Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 3:02 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 12:58 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05257759
Status:
TERMINATED
Last Update Posted:
2025-02-19
First Post:
2022-01-25
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Use of Neurostimulation As a Tool for Reconditioning the Neuromuscular System of Patients Admitted to the ICU for Septic Shock
Sponsor:
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Use of Neurostimulation As a Tool for Reconditioning the Neuromuscular System of Patients Admitted to the ICU for Septic Shock: a Single-center Randomized Pilot Study
Status:
TERMINATED
Status Verified Date:
2025-02
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
lack of recruitment for the study
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
STIMUREA
Brief Summary:
Patients hospitalized in the ICU are likely to develop sarcopenia due to a progressive and generalized decrease in muscle mass that is responsible for generalized muscle weakness known as resuscitation neuromyopathy. This neuromyopathy is known make weaning from mechanical ventilation more difficult, which prolongs the hospitalization of patients in the ICU and in hospital. The factors identified as being partly responsible for this neuromyopathy are: immobilization, undernutrition, prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation, inflammation (notably secondary to sepsis), and multivisceral failure. These factors are essentially found in patients in septic shock, which represents about 20% of patients admitted to the ICU, with a mortality rate close to 50%. If the management of septic shock is now well codified (i.e. vascular filling, antibiotics and/or treatment of the infectious focus by surgery +/- organ replacement therapy) as well as the early rehabilitation of ICU patients, no treatments has yet been proven to be effective in limiting the appearance of resuscitation neuromyopathy. For the last ten years, research using electrostimulation (ES) to improve muscle contraction seems to give encouraging results, both for length of hospital stay and the duration of mechanical ventilation, notably through the preservation or a significant increase in muscle strength. On the other hand, other studies did not show a significant effect on muscle strength. These conflicting results are partly related to the heterogeneity of the populations included in the studies and to the different ES approaches used to assess and recondition motor function.
In the present STIMUREA study, an original approach is proposed based on experimental research work carried out for many years within U1093 (Pr Charalambos Papaxanthis) which focuses on ES, not of the muscle surface as in most studies carried out in the ICU, but an approach based on ES of the motor nerve. Indeed, the intensity of ES used in previous studies was based on a maximum tolerated intensity leading to a direct recruitment of the most fatiguable motor units (via the activation of motor axons) but leading, in fine, to a decrease in muscle strength. The U1093 research team and previous studies have shown that protocols using high stimulation frequencies (100Hz) associated with pulse widths of 1ms and delivered at low intensities (5-10% of the maximum voluntary contraction, MVC) at the level of the motor nerve, could increase the force developed during the contraction, while decreasing the discomfort induced by the high intensities. This increase in force would be due to the indirect activation of motor neurons via large diameter sensory afferents, thus leading to a recruitment of motor units similar to that observed during voluntary contractions. In a very recent study conducted in our laboratory (INSERM U1093), it was demonstrated that the application of ES to the motor nerve at low intensities did not induce discomfort in healthy subjects, but could induce substantial strength gains (+25%) with adaptations occurring at both in the muscles and the nerves.
The proposed study is an innovative, randomized, pilot study based on motor nerve ES in a highly selected population of ICU patients in septic shock and therefore with a high risk of developing neuromyopathy, which is responsible for a significant increase in morbidity and mortality.
In the present STIMUREA study, an original approach is proposed based on experimental research work carried out for many years within U1093 (Pr Charalambos Papaxanthis) which focuses on ES, not of the muscle surface as in most studies carried out in the ICU, but an approach based on ES of the motor nerve. Indeed, the intensity of ES used in previous studies was based on a maximum tolerated intensity leading to a direct recruitment of the most fatiguable motor units (via the activation of motor axons) but leading, in fine, to a decrease in muscle strength. The U1093 research team and previous studies have shown that protocols using high stimulation frequencies (100Hz) associated with pulse widths of 1ms and delivered at low intensities (5-10% of the maximum voluntary contraction, MVC) at the level of the motor nerve, could increase the force developed during the contraction, while decreasing the discomfort induced by the high intensities. This increase in force would be due to the indirect activation of motor neurons via large diameter sensory afferents, thus leading to a recruitment of motor units similar to that observed during voluntary contractions. In a very recent study conducted in our laboratory (INSERM U1093), it was demonstrated that the application of ES to the motor nerve at low intensities did not induce discomfort in healthy subjects, but could induce substantial strength gains (+25%) with adaptations occurring at both in the muscles and the nerves.
The proposed study is an innovative, randomized, pilot study based on motor nerve ES in a highly selected population of ICU patients in septic shock and therefore with a high risk of developing neuromyopathy, which is responsible for a significant increase in morbidity and mortality.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: