Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-05 @ 11:48 AM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 9:14 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00144924
Status:
TERMINATED
Last Update Posted:
2022-02-17
First Post:
2005-09-02
Brief Title:
Open vs Laparoscopic Pyloromyotomy for Pyloric Stenosis
Sponsor:
Institute of Child Health
Organization:
Institute of Child Health
Study Overview
Official Title:
Recovery After Open Versus Laparoscopic Pyloromyotomy for Pyloric Stenosis a Double-blind Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial
Status:
TERMINATED
Status Verified Date:
2022-02
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
The aim was to recruit 200 infants 100 per group however the data monitoring and ethics committee recommended halting the trial before full recruitment because of significant treatment benefit in one group at interim analysis
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Comparison of open and laparoscopic pyloromyotomy
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None