Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 1:50 AM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 11:10 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01912755
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-05-08
First Post:
2013-07-19
Brief Title:
Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine in Lower Molars With Irreversible Pulpits
Sponsor:
University of Campinas Brazil
Organization:
University of Campinas Brazil
Study Overview
Official Title:
Anesthetic Efficacy of 4 Articaine Mandibular Infiltration and 2 Lidocaine Alveolar Nerve Block Associated With 1100000 Epinephrine in Lower Molars With Irreversible Pulpits
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The aim of this study was to verify the effectiveness of an anesthetic called articaine for dental treatment comparing it with an anesthetic commonly used in dental clinic lidocaine Two types of local anesthesia oral injection in accordance with the solution used were performed For patients anesthetized with articaine an injection of anesthesia close to the tooth to be treated was used For the anesthetic lidocaine an injection on the cheek at the bottom of the mouth was made Differences between both techniques are mainly regarding the area of numbness In the injection with articaine only a small part of the lip and the tooth was anesthetized With lidocaine injection the lower region of the entire side of the tooth and half of the tongue on the same side was numbed The treatment was electronic randomized and there was equal chance to one or another treatment The investigators are studying this new form of anesthesia near the tooth that was treated to see if it can numb the tooth to an emergency treatment if it really decreases the feeling of numbness and discomfort during the service Patients receiving articaine were submitted to cone beam exam at no cost
Detailed Description:
Aim This randomized clinical trial compared the anesthetic efficacy of buccal infiltration BI with 4 articaine AR and inferior alveolar nerve block IANB with 2 lidocaine LI both with 1100000 epinephrine in symptomatic mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis Likewise we compared the efficacy of the primary infiltration BI or IANB with one supplemental injection intraligamentary infiltration with articaine for AR and BI with articaine for LI The influences of buccal cortical bone thickness and root distances to buccal cortical bone on articaine performance AR were also evaluated using cone-beam tomography methodology Volunteers presenting symptomatic mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis were randomly divided into two groups 30 for AR and 20 for LI Success was recorded when complete pain-free treatment was achieved after primary injection or when one supplemental injection was needed for emergency endodontic procedures
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None