Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 5:05 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 4:08 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01291927
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2011-02-09
First Post:
2011-02-08
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Pancreas-sparing Duodenectomy Versus Pancreatoduodenectomy for Early-stage Periampullary Carcinoma
Sponsor:
Southwest Hospital, China
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of Pancreas-sparing Duodenectomy With Pancreatoduodenectomy for Early-stage Periampullary Carcinoma:A Prospective Non-Randomized Trial
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2011-01
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility, safety, and long-term prognosis of pancreas-sparing duodenectomy with regional lymphadenectomy in the treatment of early-stage (pTis/pT1/pT2) periampullary carcinoma with or without lymph node metastasis
Detailed Description:
Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is commonly used for periampullary carcinoma (PC). In recent years, morbidity and mortality rates following PD have decreased, but the operative stress induced by pancreatectomy is considerable. Less-invasive surgery should thus be elected for PC without pancreatic and diffuse lymph node involvement. From the perspective of organ-preserving resection, pancreas-sparing duodenectomy (PSD) represents an attractive option for selected periampullary tumors, and offers an alternative to PD.
Previous reports have described PSD for benign, premalignant and some selected malignant conditions of duodenum, and have emphasized this procedure as a safe and effective treatment associated with good quality of life. However, use of PSD for PC is still controversial.Available data about PSD for PC and published data from the follow-up evaluation in the literature are still limited.
Given the fact that 20%-60% pT1/pT2 patients have regional lymph node metastasis, regional lymph node dissection should be essential for PC. However, lymphadenectomy has never been promoted as a regular procedure of PSD.The aim of the present study was to investigate the feasibility, safety, and long-term results of PSD with regional lymphadenectomy for early-stage (pTis/pT1/pT2) periampullary cancers.
Previous reports have described PSD for benign, premalignant and some selected malignant conditions of duodenum, and have emphasized this procedure as a safe and effective treatment associated with good quality of life. However, use of PSD for PC is still controversial.Available data about PSD for PC and published data from the follow-up evaluation in the literature are still limited.
Given the fact that 20%-60% pT1/pT2 patients have regional lymph node metastasis, regional lymph node dissection should be essential for PC. However, lymphadenectomy has never been promoted as a regular procedure of PSD.The aim of the present study was to investigate the feasibility, safety, and long-term results of PSD with regional lymphadenectomy for early-stage (pTis/pT1/pT2) periampullary cancers.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: