Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 5:04 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 4:06 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05186818
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2025-02-27
First Post:
2021-12-23
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Aficamten vs Placebo in Adults With Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (SEQUOIA-HCM)
Sponsor:
Cytokinetics
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CK-3773274 in Adults With Symptomatic Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2025-02
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
SEQUOIA-HCM
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aficamten (CK-3773274) versus placebo in adults with symptomatic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction.
Detailed Description:
CY 6031 was a Phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multi-center trial in participants with symptomatic oHCM. Eligible participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive aficamten or placebo. Randomization was stratified by use of beta-blockers (yes or no) and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) exercise modality (treadmill or bicycle). Enrollment limits were applied as follows: participants taking beta-blockers were capped at approximately 70% of total enrollment; participants taking disopyramide were capped at approximately 10% of total enrollment; participants with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) at screening were capped at approximately 15% of total enrollment; and participants using the bicycle CPET exercise modality were capped at approximately 50% of total enrollment.
Investigational product (IP) was administered orally once daily (QD) with or without food for 24 weeks. During the initial 6 weeks of the treatment period, IP doses were individually titrated at Weeks 2, 4, and 6 based on echocardiography-guided criteria. Dose escalation at Weeks 2, 4, and 6 occurred only if a participant had a Valsalva LVOT-G ≥ 30 mmHg and a biplane left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 55%. Echocardiograms were performed at each subsequent visit during the trial, and the IP dose was down-titrated if the LVEF was \< 50%. The primary endpoint of peak oxygen uptake (pVO2) was measured by CPET at screening and at the end of treatment (Week 24). A participant's background HCM therapy was individually optimized according to local practice prior to enrollment in the study.
Investigational product (IP) was administered orally once daily (QD) with or without food for 24 weeks. During the initial 6 weeks of the treatment period, IP doses were individually titrated at Weeks 2, 4, and 6 based on echocardiography-guided criteria. Dose escalation at Weeks 2, 4, and 6 occurred only if a participant had a Valsalva LVOT-G ≥ 30 mmHg and a biplane left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 55%. Echocardiograms were performed at each subsequent visit during the trial, and the IP dose was down-titrated if the LVEF was \< 50%. The primary endpoint of peak oxygen uptake (pVO2) was measured by CPET at screening and at the end of treatment (Week 24). A participant's background HCM therapy was individually optimized according to local practice prior to enrollment in the study.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
Secondary ID Infos
| Secondary ID | Type | Domain | Link | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-003536-92 | EUDRACT_NUMBER | None | View |